An in vitro study using confocal laser scanning microscopy to evaluate the marginal misfits of different implant‐supported frameworks

Author:

Tonin Bruna S. H.1ORCID,Fu Jing2,Peixoto Raniel F.13ORCID,Fischer Nicholas G.4ORCID,Fernandes Regina M.1,Curylofo Patrícia A.1,de Mattos Maria da Gloria C.1,Macedo Ana Paula1ORCID,de Almeida Rossana P.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Dental Material and Prosthesis, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry University of São Paulo (USP) Ribeirão Preto São Paulo Brazil

2. Department of Prosthodontics, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University School of Stomatology of Qingdao University Qingdao China

3. Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of Pharmacy Dentistry and Nursing, Federal University of Ceará (UFC) Fortaleza Ceará Brazil

4. Minnesota Dental Research Center for Biomaterials and Biomechanics, School of Dentistry University of Minnesota (UMN) Minneapolis Minnesota USA

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThis study aimed to develop and evaluate a simple, non‐destructive method for assessing the misfit and passivity of implant‐retained prostheses frameworks.Materials and MethodsTo simulate the rehabilitation of a mandible posterior partially edentulous area using 3‐unit screw‐retained frameworks supported by two implants were fabricated and divided into the following five groups (n = 10 in each group): OP = one‐piece framework cast in Co‐Cr with the conventional method (control‐group); Co‐Cr frameworks sectioned and welded by laser (=LAS) or tungsten inert gas (=TIG); Co‐Cr CAD‐CAM = milled Co‐Cr framework; Zir CAD‐CAM = milled zirconia framework. The horizontal |X| and vertical |Y| misfits were measured using confocal laser scanning microscopy with one or both screws tightened. Data were analyzed by a two‐way ANOVA with repeated measures and Bonferroni correction (α = 0.05).ResultsThe greatest |X| misfit was observed in the OP group with both screws tightened (290 µm) and one screw tightened (388 and 340 µm). The conventional casting groups sectioned and welded by laser or TIG had lower mean values (235.35 µm, both screws tightened; and 275 µm, one screw tightened) than the OP framework. However, these values still exceeded those of the milled Co‐Cr and zirconia frameworks (190 and 216 µm with both screws tightened). Across all reading conditions, every framework subjected to testing consistently maintained vertical |Y| misfit levels below the threshold of 53 µm; however, the milled frameworks exhibited higher vertical misfits than the frameworks obtained by the conventional cast method.ConclusionsThe frameworks, whether cast and sectioned with laser welding or milled from Co‐Cr, exhibit improved marginal misfit and enhanced passive fit when compared to other fabrication methods. Additionally, the use of confocal laser scanning microscopy is highly effective for passivity and misfit analysis.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3