Accuracy of virtual articulation in maximal intercuspal position in direct and indirect digital workflows for fixed partial denture fabrication

Author:

Essam Yousra1,El Kateb Mohammed1,Morsy Noha1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Conservative Dentistry Alexandria University Alexandria Egypt

Abstract

AbstractPurposeTo assess the accuracy of virtual articulation in direct digital workflow (DDW) and indirect digital workflow (IDW) in arches prepared for fixed partial dentures (FPDs).Materials and MethodsFive pairs of master models were used in this study representing different clinical scenarios of full dentate (FD), and prepared arches for fixed partial dentures as follows: FD group, short span posterior (SSP group), long span posterior (LSP group), short span anterior (SSA group), and long span anterior (LSA). Fourteen pairs of interarch reference points were added to each set of master models to measure linear interarch distance with a caliper (reference measurements). The direct digital workflow included digital scans and virtual articulation with buccal scan images using an intraoral scanner. The indirect digital workflow included conventional polyvinylsiloxane impressions and bites followed by pouring, mounting, and scanning the stone models in a laboratory scanner. The scanned stone models were virtually articulated with buccal scanning in the laboratory scanner. Digital linear interarch measurements on all virtually‐articulated models were compared with reference measurements. The absolute mean differences in linear interarch distances were calculated. The Mann‐Whitney test was used for statistical analysis (α = .05).ResultsThe direct digital workflow produced significantly less linear interarch deviations in the virtually articulated models compared to the indirect digital workflow for all study groups (P < .05). However, the direct digital workflow had significantly less accuracy for virtual articulation in long span posterior, long span anterior, and short span anterior groups compared to the full dentate group. ConclusionsBoth workflows produced virtually‐articulated models with acceptable accuracy. However, the direct digital workflow had significantly better accuracy in all assessed clinical scenarios.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3