Dental students' perceptions of simultaneous live and online OSCEs during the COVID‐19 pandemic

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionThe Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is a valid, reliable and reproducible assessment method traditionally carried out as a live examination but recently also provided online. The aim was to compare any differences in the perceptions of dental students participating in online and live OSCE using mixed methods.Materials and MethodsAll Finnish fourth‐year undergraduate dental students (n = 172) attended the exam in April 2021. Due to the COVID‐19 pandemic, the official administrative restrictions in teaching in universities still existed in April 2021. By the time of the national OSCE, the pandemic situation varied in different parts of the country. Therefore, two of the universities conducted a live OSCE and two an online version of the OSCE. Data were collected after the OSCE using a voluntary anonymous electronic questionnaire with multiple‐choice and open‐ended questions (response rate 58%). Differences between the OSCE versions were analysed using the Mann–Whitney U test and open answers with qualitative content analysis.ResultsThe students considered both types of OSCE good in general. The main differences were found concerned adequate time allocation and overall technical implementation, in favour of the live OSCE. While a qualitative analysis revealed exam anxiety as the most often mentioned negative issue, overall, comments were positive.ConclusionVariation in the assessments between different question entities seemed to be wider than between the implemented OSCE versions. Time management in the OSCE should be further developed by managing the assignment of tasks.