Affiliation:
1. Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK
2. Bone Cancer Research Trust Leeds UK
3. NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre Leeds UK
4. School of Healthcare University of Leeds Leeds UK
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionPeople living with a painful distal upper limb musculoskeletal disorder (DUL‐MSD) often experience pain, difficulty in doing everyday tasks and a reduced quality of life. Currently, there are challenges in the treatment of DUL‐MSDs, highlighting the need to develop innovative approaches to rehabilitation. A potential solution is to develop and implement a digital self‐management rehabilitation programme focussing on optimising recovery, improving function and reducing pain. Before developing this programme, we aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to using a digital health intervention (DHI) for self‐management of DUL‐MSDs.ObjectiveThis study aimed to investigate the potential barriers and facilitators to using a DHI with people living with DUL‐MSDs and healthcare professionals (HCPs).MethodsA qualitative exploratory study was carried out with purposely selected participants consisting of 15 participants with DUL‐MSDs and 13 HCPs. Three focus groups (FGs) and four semistructured interviews with DUL‐MSD participants and semistructured interviews with 13 HCPs were conducted. FGs and interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsTo address challenges in the care and management of DUL‐MSDs, both HCPs and people living with a DUL‐MSD welcomed the development of a DHI. This study identified several barriers and facilitators that would influence engagement with a digital intervention. Findings suggest that in developing a DHI, attention needs to be paid to digital design features, usability, tailoring, personalisation and consideration of how well usual care could be replicated digitally without direct HCP involvement.ConclusionThe identified digital design features of importance to participants will inform the design of a digital self‐management rehabilitation programme for people living with DUL‐MSDs. Addressing the barriers and facilitators to engagement with a DHI is essential in ensuring its relevance and acceptability to those who will use it.Patient or Public ContributionPatient and Public Involvement and Engagement (PPIE) was integral throughout the study. PPIE members contributed to the development and planning of this study, checked and confirmed the relevance of the findings and are involved in the dissemination plans.
Reference58 articles.
1. A systematic review of prognostic factors for distal upper limb pain
2. Pathophysiology of non-specific arm pain
3. Epidemiology of Osteoarthritis
4. The Royal College of Surgeons of England and the British Orthopaedic Association. Commissioning guide. Treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome 2017.2017. Accessed August 7 2023.https://www.boa.ac.uk/static/def06e52-94d4-46b9-a482b7c4b9ded7f8/carpal%20tunnel%20syndrome%20guide.pdf