Affiliation:
1. Chair of Forest Entomology and Protection University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
2. Department of Forest Protection Forest Research Institute Baden‐Württemberg Freiburg Germany
3. Chair of Ecosystem Physiology University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
4. Pacific Southwest Research Station USDA Forest Service Vallejo California USA
Abstract
AbstractThe European spruce bark beetle, Ips typographus (L.), is the most important forest pest in Europe due to the profound impacts of periodic outbreaks on ecosystem goods and services. Herein, we evaluated the responses of I. typographus to different doses of verbenone (SPLAT® Verb, 10% (−)‐verbenone by weight; ISCA Inc., Riverside, CA, USA) in traps baited with its aggregation pheromones. Results are based on 1,492,289 I. typographus collected in five experiments over 3 years. SPLAT® Verb inhibited the response of I. typographus to baited traps out to 14 m from the point of release (dollop) and for >80 days at a dose of 75 g per dollop. Reductions in trap catch ranged from 34% to 93% depending on the dose of verbenone, age of SPLAT® Verb dollops, distance from dollops and the environment. In forest stands, significant reductions in trap catch were observed at distances up to 14 m from the point of release, with the largest reductions observed at 0 m (93%) and 2 m (64%). In an open area, significant reductions in trap catch were observed at distances up to only 2 m from the point of release, with the largest reduction observed at 0 m (66%). The much lower active inhibitory range of verbenone in the open area appears to be explained by less stable accumulations of verbenone in the surrounding air. There was a significant negative correlation between trap catch and the amount of verbenone measured in air in the vicinity of traps. We also observed inhibition of the sixtoothed spruce bark beetle, Pityogenes chalcographus (L.), another important forest pest in Europe, at all doses (20, 40, 75 and 100 g) of SPLAT® Verb that were evaluated. The implications of these and other results to the management of I. typographus are discussed.