Are we ready to bridge classification systems? A comprehensive review of different reporting systems in thyroid cytology

Abstract

AbstractThe evaluation of thyroid lesions is common in the daily practice of cytology. While the majority of thyroid nodules are benign, in recent decades, there has been increased detection of small and well‐differentiated thyroid cancers. Combining ultrasound evaluation with fine‐needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is extremely useful in the management of thyroid nodules. Furthermore, the adoption of specific terminology, introduced by different thyroid reporting systems, has helped effectively communicate thyroid FNAC diagnoses in a clear and understandable way. In 1996, the Papanicolaou Society thyroid cytological classification was introduced. This was followed in 2005 by the first Japanese and then in 2007 by the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, which subsequently underwent two revisions. Other international thyroid terminology classifications include the British, Italian, Australasian and other Japanese cytology systems. This review covers similarities and differences among these cytology classification systems and highlights key points that unify these varied approaches to reporting thyroid FNAC diagnoses.