Are men treated differently in clinical placements during nursing studies? A cross‐sectional study

Author:

Salamonson Yenna12ORCID,Maneze Della12ORCID,Smith Brandon W.12ORCID,Duff Jed3ORCID,Theobald Karen A.4ORCID,Montayre Jed25ORCID,McTier Lauren6ORCID,Donnelly Frank7ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing University of Wollongong Wollongong New South Wales Australia

2. School of Nursing and Midwifery Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia

3. Centre for Healthcare Transformation Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

4. School of Nursing Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

5. School of Nursing The Hongkong Polytechnic University Hung Hom Hongkong SAR China

6. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Centre for Quality and Patient Safety Research, Institute for Health Transformation Deakin University Geelong Victoria Australia

7. Adelaide Nursing School University of Adelaide Adelaide South Australia Australia

Abstract

AbstractAim and ObjectiveTo explore the perceptions of nursing students regarding the treatment of men in nursing during their clinical placement.BackgroundNegative placement experiences of men who are nursing students is a risk factor for student attrition. Hence, exploring gender disparity in treatment during placement from both men and women studying nursing will contribute to improving student experience and reducing attrition.DesignSurvey capturing both quantitative and qualitative data.MethodsNursing students were surveyed between July and September 2021 across 16 Schools of Nursing in Australia. In addition to the Clinical Learning Environment Inventory (CLEI‐19), an open‐ended question explored if men received different treatment during clinical placement.ResultsThose who expressed difference in treatment of men were less satisfied with their clinical learning experience (p < .001). Of the 486 (39.6%) who responded to the open‐ended question, 152 (31%) indicated a difference in the treatment of men, reporting that men received: (a) better (39%); (b) different, not exclusively better or worse (19%); and (c) worse (42%) treatment from either the clinical facilitator or ward staff. While both men and women perceived gender differences in the treatment of men during placement, men were more likely to report worse treatment.ConclusionDespite the advances achieved in recruiting men in nursing, negative experiences during clinical placement are characterised by stereotypes, prejudice and discrimination, adversely impact retention.Relevance to clinical practiceNurse educators need to recognise specific support students require during placement regardless of gender. Our findings reinforce the adverse impacts of inequitable treatment on both men and women nursing students on learning, clinical performance, morale and ultimately on retention in the nursing workforce. Addressing gender stereotyping and discrimination in the undergraduate nursing program is an important step in promoting diversity and inclusivity in the nursing workforce.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3