Barriers and enablers to providing evidence‐based in‐hospital urinary continence care: A cross‐sectional survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework

Author:

Boyle Kerry12ORCID,Marsden Dianne Lesley123ORCID,Waller Amy23ORCID,Duff Jed34ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Hunter Stroke Service Hunter New England Local Heath District New Lambton Heights New South Wales Australia

2. Hunter Medical Research Institute New Lambton Heights New South Wales Australia

3. College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing‐University of Newcastle Callaghan New South Wales Australia

4. School of Nursing and Centre for Healthcare Transformation Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractAimsTo identify the barriers and enablers perceived by hospital‐based clinicians to providing evidence‐based continence care to inpatients.DesignThis was a cross‐sectional study of inpatient clinicians using a questionnaire.MethodsAcute care and rehabilitation clinicians from 15 wards that admit patients after stroke at 12 hospitals (NSW = 11, Queensland =1, metropolitan = 4, regional = 8) were invited to complete an online questionnaire. The 58 questions (answered on a 5‐point Likert scale) were aligned to 13 of the 14 domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Results were dichotomized into ‘strongly agree/agree’ and ‘unsure/disagree/strongly disagree’ and proportions were calculated. Data collection occurred between January 2019 and March 2019.ResultsThe questionnaire was completed by 291 participants with 88% being nurses. Barriers were found in nine domains including knowledge; skills; memory attention and decision making; emotion; environmental context and resources; behavioural regulation; social professional role; intensions, social influences; and beliefs about capabilities. Enablers were found in seven domains including goals; social influences; knowledge; skills; social, professional role and identity; reinforcement and beliefs about consequences.ConclusionThis multi‐site, multi‐professional study that included predominantly nurses highlights the barriers and enablers to inpatient continence care. Future implementation studies in inpatient continence management should address these identified barriers and enablers to improve effectiveness of implementation of evidence‐based care.Implications for the professionThis study highlights that although there are many barriers to ward nurses providing evidence‐based continence care, there are also several enablers. Both should be addressed to improve practice.Reporting methodWe adhered to the Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E‐Surveys (CHERRIES) (Supplementary File 1).Relevance to clinical practiceEstablishing barriers to practice gives a broader understanding of why practice does not occur and establishes areas where researchers and clinicians need to address in order to change behaviour.

Funder

Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle Australia

Hunter New England Local Health District

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3