Community‐level incidence and treatment seeking during febrile illness: Insights from health behaviour surveys in rural Thailand and Laos

Author:

Haenssgen Marco J.1ORCID,Charoenboon Nutcha2ORCID,Early Annabelle3ORCID,Althaus Thomas45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Social Science and Development Chiang Mai University Chiang Mai Thailand

2. Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School University of Bristol Bristol UK

3. Global Sustainable Development, School of Cross‐Faculty Studies University of Warwick Coventry UK

4. Centre Scientifique de Monaco Monaco Monaco

5. Direction de l'Action Sanitaire Monaco Monaco

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveCritical gaps remain in understanding community perceptions and treatment‐seeking behaviours in case of fever. This is especially relevant considering global antimicrobial resistance, where fever is assumed to provoke non‐judicious antibiotic use. Our study objective was therefore to document the community‐level incidence of fever, the resulting treatment‐seeking processes, and their underlying behavioural drivers.MethodsIn a cross‐sectional observational design, we used descriptive and inferential statistics and multivariable regression analysis to estimate the population‐level incidence of fever and individual and socio‐economic factors associated with treatment‐seeking process characteristics. We utilised a detailed publicly available survey of community‐level treatment‐seeking behaviour (collected in 2017/2018), comprising a representative sample of 2130 rural adults in Thailand (Chiang Rai Province) and Lao PDR (Salavan Province).ResultsFever was reported by 7.1% of the rural adult population in Chiang Rai (95% CI: 5.1%–9.0%) and 7.5% in Salavan (95% CI: 4.5%–10.5%) during a 2‐month recall period. Treatment‐seeking patterns varied by socio‐economic characteristics like precarious employment. 69.3% (95% CI: 60.8%–77.7%) of fever episodes involved access to formal (public/private) healthcare providers, 11.0% (95% CI: 4.5%–17.5%) involved informal providers, and 24.3% (95% CI: 16.6%–32.1%) took place without either formal or informal healthcare access. Febrile patients had on average 0.39 antibiotic use episodes when accessing formal healthcare settings, compared to 0.05 otherwise (p < 0.01).ConclusionTreatment‐seeking behaviour during fever varies according to population characteristics. Clinical studies would benefit from contextualising quantitative outcomes. Treatment algorithms for non‐malarial febrile illnesses should involve outreach to informal healthcare and community settings to support patients in precarious circumstances, and antibiotic resistance interventions should prioritise formal healthcare facilities.

Funder

University of Warwick

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Infectious Diseases,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Parasitology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3