Efficacy of prescribed opioids for acute pain after being discharged from the emergency department: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Daoust Raoul123ORCID,Paquet Jean1,Marquis Martin1,Williamson David34,Fontaine Guillaume56,Chauny Jean‐Marc123,Frégeau Amélie12,Orkin Aaron M.78,Upadhye Suneel9ORCID,Lessard Justine123,Cournoyer Alexis123

Affiliation:

1. Study Center in Emergency Medicine Hôpital du Sacré‐Coeur de Montréal (CIUSSS du Nord‐de‐l’Île de‐Montréal) Montréal Québec Canada

2. Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d'Urgence, Faculté de Médecine Université de Montréal Montréal Québec Canada

3. Centre de Recherce Hôpital du Sacré‐Cœur de Montréal (CIUSSS du Nord de‐l’Île‐de‐Montréal) Montréal Québec Canada

4. Faculté de Pharmacie Université de Montréal Montréal Québec Canada

5. Centre for Implementation Research, Clinical Epidemiology Program Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Ottawa Ontario Canada

6. Faculty of Medicine University of Ottawa Ottawa Ontario Canada

7. Department of Family and Community Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public Health University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada

8. Department of Emergency Medicine St. Joseph's Health Centre, Unity Health Toronto Ontario Canada

9. McMaster University Division of Emergency Medicine Hamilton Ontario Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOpioids are often prescribed for acute pain to patients discharged from the emergency department (ED), but there is a paucity of data on their short‐term use. The purpose of this study was to synthesize the evidence regarding the efficacy of prescribed opioids compared to nonopioid analgesics for acute pain relief in ED‐discharged patients.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and gray literature databases were searched from inception to January 2023. Two independent reviewers selected randomized controlled trials investigating the efficacy of prescribed opioids for ED‐discharged patients, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Authors were contacted for missing data and to identify additional studies. The primary outcome was the difference in pain intensity scores or pain relief. All meta‐analyses used a random‐effect model and a sensitivity analysis compared patients treated with codeine versus those treated with other opioids.ResultsFrom 5419 initially screened citations, 46 full texts were evaluated and six studies enrolling 1161 patients were included. Risk of bias was low for five studies. There was no statistically significant difference in pain intensity scores or pain relief between opioids versus nonopioid analgesics (standardized mean difference [SMD] 0.12; 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.10 to 0.34). Contrary to children, adult patients treated with opioid had better pain relief (SMD 0.28, 95% CI 0.13–0.42) compared to nonopioids. In another sensitivity analysis excluding studies using codeine, opioids were more effective than nonopioids (SMD 0.30, 95% CI 0.15–0.45). However, there were more adverse events associated with opioids (odds ratio 2.64, 95% CI 2.04–3.42).ConclusionsFor ED‐discharged patients with acute musculoskeletal pain, opioids do not seem to be more effective than nonopioid analgesics. However, this absence of efficacy seems to be driven by codeine, as opioids other than codeine are more effective than nonopioids (mostly NSAIDs). Further prospective studies on the efficacy of short‐term opioid use after ED discharge (excluding codeine), measuring patient‐centered outcomes, adverse events, and potential misuse, are needed.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3