Disparities in emergency department and urgent care opioid prescribing before and after randomized clinician feedback interventions

Author:

Crowley Aidan P.1ORCID,Sun Chuxuan1,Yan Xiaowei (Sherry)2,Navathe Amol134,Liao Joshua M.35,Patel Mitesh S.6,Pagnotti David1,Shen Zijun2,Delgado M. Kit37

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

2. Center for Health Systems Research Sutter Health Walnut Creek California USA

3. Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

4. Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Medicine University of Washington School of Medicine Seattle Washington USA

6. Ascension St. Louis Missouri USA

7. Department of Emergency Medicine and Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesRacial and ethnic minorities receive opioid prescriptions at lower rates and dosages than White patients. Though opioid stewardship interventions can improve or exacerbate these disparities, there is little evidence about these effects. We conducted a secondary analysis of a cluster‐randomized controlled trial conducted among 438 clinicians from 21 emergency departments and 27 urgent care clinics. Our objective was to determine whether randomly allocated opioid stewardship clinician feedback interventions that were designed to reduce opioid prescriptions had unintended effects on disparities in prescribing by patient race and ethnicity.MethodsThe primary outcome was likelihood of receiving a low‐pill prescription (low ≤10 pills, medium 11–19 pills, high ≥20 pills). Generalized mixed‐effects models were used to determine patient characteristics associated with low‐pill prescriptions during the baseline period. These models were then used to determine whether receipt of a low‐pill prescription varied by patient race or ethnicity during the intervention period between usual care and three opioid stewardship interventions: (1) individual audit feedback, (2) peer comparison feedback, and (3) combined (individual audit + peer comparison) feedback.ResultsCompared with White patients, Black patients were more likely to receive a low‐pill prescription during the baseline (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06–1.31, p = 0.002) and intervention (adjusted OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.07–1.91, p = 0.015). While combined feedback was associated with an overall increase in low‐pill prescriptions as intended (adjusted OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.28–2.78, p = 0.001), there were no significant differences in treatment effects of any of the interventions by patient race and ethnicity.ConclusionsCombined individual audit and peer comparison feedback was associated with fewer opioid pills per prescription equally by patient race and ethnicity. However, the intervention did not significantly close the baseline disparity in prescribing by race.

Funder

Patrick and Catherine Weldon Donaghue Medical Research Foundation

Hawaii Medical Service Association

Commonwealth Fund

Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Pennsylvania Department of Health

Humana Foundation

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3