A qualitative analysis of patients’ experiences with an emergency department diagnosis of gastrointestinal cancer

Author:

Adams Alexandra1ORCID,Heinert Sara2ORCID,Sanchez Lauren34,Karasz Alison5,Ramos Maria Elena4,Sarkar Srawani4,Rapkin Bruce36,In Haejin167

Affiliation:

1. Division of Surgical Oncology Rutgers Cancer Institute New Brunswick New Jersey USA

2. Department of Emergency Medicine Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School New Brunswick New Jersey USA

3. Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

4. Department of Surgery Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

5. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School Worcester Massachusetts USA

6. Department of Epidemiology and Population Health Albert Einstein College of Medicine New York New York USA

7. Department of Health, Behavior and Policy Rutgers University Piscataway New Jersey USA

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesOptimally, cancer is diagnosed through periodic screening or detection of early symptoms in primary care settings. However, an estimated 23%–52% of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are diagnosed in the emergency department (ED). Cancer diagnosed in the ED has been associated with worse clinical and patient‐reported outcomes even after adjustment for cancer stage. We sought to explore patients' accounts of patient and health care system factors related to their diagnosis in the ED and their lived experience of receiving a diagnosis in this setting.MethodsPatients with an ED visit during or within 30 days of their GI cancer diagnosis at an urban academic hospital serving a largely disadvantaged population were recruited. Interviews were coded in NVivo 12 and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach.ResultsPatient‐reported factors associated with their experiences included denial and avoidance of symptoms, mistrust of the health system, and lack of cancer screening knowledge. Health care system factors included misdiagnosis and delayed access to specialty care or tests. Experiences receiving a cancer diagnosis in the ED were overwhelmingly negative.ConclusionsThis study highlights the unmet needs in identifying and diagnosing patients who ultimately present to the ED for evaluation and eventual diagnosis of cancer. Our results shed light on several modifiable factors, including the need for increased public awareness of the asymptomatic nature of cancer and the importance of cancer screening. Additionally, health care systems modifications beyond the ED are needed to improve access to timely care when symptoms arise.

Funder

Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Emergency Medicine,General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3