The Effects of the Jump‐In Whole‐School Intervention on the Weight Development of Children in Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Author:

Busch Vincent1ORCID,Steenkamer Ilona2,van Nassau Femke3,van Opdorp Paul4,van Houtum Lieke1,Verhoeff Arnoud56,Twisk Jos7

Affiliation:

1. Sarphati Amsterdam, Department of Healthy Living Public Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Healthy Living Public Health Service (GGD), Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam The Netherlands

3. Department of Public and Occupational Health Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

4. Department of Healthy Living Public Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT Amsterdam The Netherlands

5. Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018WV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Director, Sarphati Amsterdam, Department of Healthy Living, Public Health Service (GGD) Amsterdam, City of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018WT Amsterdam The Netherlands

6. Department of Sociology, University of Amsterdam. Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam The Netherlands

7. Department of Epidemiology and Data Science Amsterdam UMC, De Boelelaan 1089a, 1081 HV Amsterdam The Netherlands

Abstract

ABSTRACTBACKGROUNDThis study assessed the effects of the “Jump‐in” whole‐school intervention in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, on children's weight development by comparing children exposed to the intervention and controls from 3 other large Dutch cities. Jump‐in is a comprehensive intervention that aims to stimulate healthy nutrition and physical activity in children at primary schools in Amsterdam. In addition, the relationship between the intervention's implementation degree and its effectiveness was studied.METHODSDemographic and anthropometric data, collected by youth health care professionals via routine health checks at T0 (2014) and T1 (2019), were used to analyze possible intervention effects by comparing the weight development of children exposed to the Jump‐in intervention versus unexposed controls. Implementation logs from health promotion professionals were used to determine intervention effects per implementation degree. Multilevel regression analyses were used for all analyses.RESULTSIn total, 4299 children were included mean age ± 5.5 years (T0), 10.6 years (T1), and ≈50% boys/girls at both times. Receiving the fully implemented intervention resulted in a decline in standardized body‐mass index (zBMI) compared to the controls (−0.23, confidence interval [CI] −0.33, −0.13). It also led to higher odds to move into a healthier weight category over time (odds ratio [OR] 1.36, CI 1.06, 1.74), yet no statistically significant shift towards a healthy weight was found.CONCLUSIONSRelative to the controls, children exposed to the intervention showed positive zBMI developments, with stronger effects when the implementation degree was higher. Despite positive results, creating more impact might require the further integration of school‐based programs into whole‐systems approaches that include other energy‐balance behaviors.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Philosophy,Education

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3