Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgery Section of Transplantation and the Section of Nephrology Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
2. Department of Medicine, Section of Nephrology Wake Forest School of Medicine Winston‐Salem North Carolina USA
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionThere is limited experience transplanting kidneys from either expanded criteria donors (ECD) or donation after circulatory death (DCD) deceased donors with terminal acute kidney injury (AKI).MethodsAKI kidneys were defined by a donor terminal serum creatinine level >2.0 mg/dL whereas non‐ideal deceased donor (NIDD) kidneys were defined as AKI/DCD or AKI/ECDs.ResultsFrom February 2007 to March 2023, we transplanted 266 single AKI donor kidneys including 29 from ECDs, 29 from DCDs (n = 58 NIDDs), and 208 from brain‐dead standard criteria donors (SCDs). Mean donor age (43.7 NIDD vs. 33.5 years SCD), KDPI (66% NIDD vs. 45% SCD), and recipient age (57 NIDD vs. 51 years SCD) were higher in the NIDD group (all p < .01). Mean waiting times (17.8 NIDD vs. 24.2 months SCD) and dialysis duration (34 NIDD vs. 47 months SCD) were shorter in the NIDD group (p < .05). Delayed graft function (DGF, 48%) and 1‐year graft survival (92.7% NIDD vs. 95.9% SCD) was similar in both groups. Five‐year patient and kidney graft survival rates were 82.1% versus 89.9% and 82.1% versus 75.2% (both p = NS) in the NIDD versus SCD groups, respectively.ConclusionsThe use of kidneys from AKI donors can be safely liberalized to include selected ECD and DCD donors.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献