A comprehensive MRI investigation to identify potential biomarkers of Osgood Schlatter disease in adolescents: A cross sectional study comparing Osgood Schlatter disease with controls

Author:

Sørensen L. B.1,Holden S.123ORCID,Oei E. H. G.4,Magnusson S. P.56,Olesen J. L.7,Dean B. J. F.8,Hever M.9,Lyng K.17ORCID,Rathleff M. S.1710ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Science and Technology Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

2. School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sports Science University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

3. Institute for Sport and Health University College Dublin Dublin Ireland

4. Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands

5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery M Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen Denmark

6. Department of Physical Therapy Bispebjerg Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

7. Center for General Practice at Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

8. Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Science (NDORMS), Botnar Research Centre University of Oxford Oxford UK

9. Department of Radiology Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

10. Department of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundOsgood–Schlatter disease (OSD) is the most common knee pain complaint among adolescents playing sports. Despite this, there remains controversy over the pathophysiology and whether specific anatomical characteristics are associated with OSD.PurposeThis study aimed to systematically and comprehensively characterize adolescents with OSD using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared to pain‐free controls, including both tissue abnormalities that may be associated with OSD, as well as anatomical characteristics. A secondary objective was to identify potential imaging biomarkers associated with pain.Study DesignCross‐sectional study.MethodsAdolescents with OSD and controls were recruited from 2020 to 2022. Following a clinical exam, demographics, pain, sports participation, and Tanner stage were collected. Knee MRI was conducted on the participants' most symptomatic knee (OSD) or the dominant leg (controls).ResultsSixty‐seven adolescents (46 with OSD and 30 controls) were included. 80% of participants with OSD had at least one tissue alteration compared to 54% of controls. Compared to controls, OSD had 36.3 (95%CI 4.5 to 289.7) higher odds of bony oedema at the tibial tuberosity, and 32.7 (95%CI 4.1 to 260.6) and 5.3 (95%CI 0.6 to 46.2) higher odds of bony oedema at the  tibial epiphysis and metaphysis respectively. Participants with OSD also had higher odds of fluid/oedema at the patellar tendon (12.3 95%CI 3.3 to 46.6), and superficial infrapatellar bursitis (7.2).  Participants with OSD had a more proximal tendon attachment (mean tibial attachment portion difference, −0.05, 95% CI: −0.1 to 0.0, p = 0.02), tendon thickness (proximal mean difference, −0.09, 95% CI: −0.4 to 0.2, p = 0.04; distal mean difference, −0.6, 95% CI: −0.9 to −0.2, p = 0.01). Those with bony/tendon oedema had 1.8 points (95% CI: 0.3 to 3.2) higher pain on palpation than those without (t = −2.5, df = 26.6, p = 0.019), but there was no difference between these groups in a functional single leg pain provocation.ConclusionAdolescents with OSD present with tissue and structural abnormalities on MRI that differed from age‐matched controls. The majority had findings in the patellar tendon and bone, which often co‐occurred. However, a small proportion of OSD also presents without alterations. It appears these findings may be associated with clinical OSD‐related pain on palpation of the tibial tuberosity.Clinical RelevanceOur highlight the pathophysiology on imaging, which has implications for understanding the mechanism and treatment of OSD.

Funder

Gigtforeningen

Sundhed og Sygdom, Det Frie Forskningsråd

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3