Relationship between geographic accessibility to emergency services and infant mortality: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Brito Patrícia Meireles1ORCID,Ribeiro Katia Suely Queiroz Silva2ORCID,Melo Renato S.13ORCID,Tavares Netto Afonso Rodrigues3ORCID,Sarinho Silvia Wanick1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Post‐Graduate Program on Child and Adolescent Health Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Recife Pernambuco Brazil

2. Department of Physical Therapy Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB) João Pessoa Paraíba Brazil

3. Department of Physical Therapy Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (UFPE) Recife Pernambuco Brazil

Abstract

AimTo evaluate the methodological quality of studies that analysed the relationship between accessibility to emergency services and infant mortality.MethodsA systematic review with meta‐analysis, registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) platform under code CRD42021279854. Medline/Pubmed, Embase, SciElo, Lilacs, Scopus and web of science electronic databases were searched between November 2021 and May 2024, without language or publication time restriction. We included observational studies that compared the infant mortality outcome with the different distances travelled or travel time to health services in a paediatric emergency. Thus, we excluded studies with primary outcomes present in the pre‐ and perinatal periods, as well as distances or travel time to obstetric emergency units. We used the grade to assess the methodological quality of the studies and the Newcastle‐Ottawa scale for the risk of bias, in addition to performing a meta‐analysis.ResultsThe evidence quality on infant mortality was moderate for four studies and low for three studies. The meta‐analysis showed that children who travelled more than 5 km to the emergency service had a 28% increase in the chance of dying (P = 0.002), as well as those travelling for more than 40 min increased by 45% (P < 0.001).ConclusionsThere was a relationship between the increase in geographic accessibility distance and travel time with the increase in infant mortality. However, the studies still showed moderate to low methodological quality.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference23 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3