Evaluation of the impact of diagnostic blood loss and red blood cell transfusion in very‐low‐birth‐weight anaemic neonates during hospitalization: A multi‐centre retrospective clinical study

Author:

Ma Ting12ORCID,Yang Jiangcun2ORCID,Sun Yang3,Song Aowei2,Zhang Jin4,Shen Yuan4,Hua Kai5,Wu Wenjing1,Chen Wei1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Laboratory The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiaotong University Xi'an Shaanxi China

2. Department of Transfusion Medicine Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital Xi'an Shaanxi China

3. Department of Data Center Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital Xi'an Shaanxi China

4. School of Public Health Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center Xi'an Shaanxi China

5. College of Life Sciences Northwest University Xi'an Shaanxi China

Abstract

AbstractBackground and ObjectivesDiagnostic blood loss is a significant factor in the development of anaemia in neonates with very low birth weight. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy of intervention approaches involving varying diagnostic blood loss and red blood cell transfusion volumes in neonates with very low birth weights experiencing anaemia during hospitalization.Materials and MethodsA total of 785 newborns with anaemia weighing less than 1500 g were enrolled from 32 hospitals in China. The study involved monitoring diagnostic blood loss and red blood cell transfusion and evaluating relevant interventions such as red blood cell transfusion and clinical outcomes. Three intervention approaches were established based on the difference between blood loss and transfusion (Intervention Approaches 0, 1 and 2). The primary outcomes measured were unsatisfactory weight gain during hospitalization and neonatal mortality. The secondary outcomes included related complications.ResultsIn the non‐hospital‐acquired anaemia group, Intervention Approach 2 had the highest incidence of below‐normal weight gain (odds ratio [OR]: 3.019, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.081–8.431, p = 0.035). Multivariate analysis revealed that Intervention Approach 1 had a protective effect on weight gain. In the hospital‐acquired anaemia group, Intervention Approach 2 had the highest incidence of below‐normal weight gain (OR: 3.335, 95% CI: 1.785–6.234, p = 0.000) and mortality (OR: 5.341, 95% CI: 2.449–11.645, p = 0.000), while Intervention Approach 1 had the lowest incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage. Intervention Approach 1 demonstrated favourable outcomes in both anaemia groups.ConclusionIntervention Approach 1 improved weight gain and reduced mortality and complications in both the non‐hospital‐acquired and hospital‐acquired anaemia groups.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3