Differences in oncological benefits from second transurethral resection between white‐light initial surgery and photodynamic diagnosis‐guided initial surgery for primary high‐risk non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer

Abstract

AbstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes between patients receiving second TUR after initial white‐light transurethral resection of bladder tumor (WL‐TURBT) and initial photodynamic diagnosis (PDD)‐assisted TURBT.MethodsA total of 1007 patients were divided into four groups based on the treatment pattern: WL‐TURBT with second TUR (161 patients, WL‐second group) or without second TUR (540 patients, WL‐alone group) and PDD‐TURBT with second TUR (112 patients, PDD‐second group) or without second TUR (194 patients, PDD‐alone group). Oncologic outcomes (bladder cancer recurrence, progression, urothelial cancer‐specific mortality) and rates of residual tumor and risk stratification of non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after second TUR were evaluated.ResultsAfter propensity score‐matching 121 patients were included each in the WL‐alone and WL‐second groups, and 63 patients each in the PDD‐alone and PDD‐second groups. In the WL group, the second TUR was significantly associated with improved progression‐free (p = 0.012) and urothelial cancer‐specific free survival (p = 0.011), but not with recurrence‐free survival (p = 0.93). Patients initially treated with PDD‐TURBT, and with a tumor diameter <30 mm and multifocality had a relatively high benefit from second TUR. The rates of residual tumor and risk stratification of NMIBC did not significantly differ between WL‐TURBT and PDD‐TURBT groups.ConclusionsOur findings suggested that a second TUR could be omitted after an initial PDD‐TURBT in selected patients with high‐risk NMIBC.