Affiliation:
1. Department of Biology Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
2. Great Lakes Laboratory for Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Fisheries and Oceans Canada Burlington Ontario Canada
3. Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science Carleton University Ottawa Ontario Canada
4. Fisheries and Oceans Canada 501 University Crescent Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
Abstract
AbstractBioenergetics models are powerful tools used to address a range of questions in fish biology. However, these models are rarely informed by free‐swimming activity data, introducing error. To quantify the costs of activity in free‐swimming fish, calibrations produced from standardized laboratory trials can be applied to estimate energy expenditure from sensor data for specific tags and species. Using swim tunnel respirometry, we calibrated acceleration sensor‐equipped transmitting tags to estimate the aerobic metabolic rates (ṀO2) of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush) at three environmentally relevant temperatures. Aerobic and swim performance were also assessed. Like other calibrations, we found strong relationships between ṀO2 and acceleration or swimming speed, and jackknife validations and data simulations suggest that our models accurately predict metabolic costs of activity in adult lake trout (~5% algebraic error and ~20% absolute error). Aerobic and swim performance metrics were similar to those reported in other studies, but their critical swimming speed was lower than expected. Additionally, lake trout exhibited a wide aerobic scope, suggesting that the avoidance of waters ≥15°C may be related to selection for optimal growing temperatures. The ability to quantify the free‐swimming energetic costs of activity will advance our understanding of lake trout ecology and may yield improvements to bioenergetics model.
Funder
Fisheries and Oceans Canada
Reference101 articles.
1. Excess digestive capacity in predators reflects a life of feast and famine
2. Fish body sizes change with temperature but not all species shrink with warming
3. Bartoń K.(2023).MuMIn: Multi‐model interface. version 1.47.5.https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html.
4. Bates D. Maechler M. Bolker B. Walker S. &Christensen R. H. B.(2023).lme4: Linear mixed‐effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4. Version 1.1‐35.1.https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html.