Challenges in engaging patients in feedback conversations for health care professionals' workplace learning

Author:

Sehlbach Carolin1ORCID,Bosveld Matthijs H.2ORCID,Romme Sjim2ORCID,Nijhuis Marieke A.3,Govaerts Marjan J. B.1ORCID,Smeenk Frank W. J. M.45ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Health Professions Education (SHE), Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

2. School of Health Professions Education (SHE) and Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

3. Patient as a Person Foundation Eijsden The Netherlands

4. Catharina Hospital Eindhoven The Netherlands

5. School of Health Professions Education (SHE) Maastricht University Maastricht The Netherlands

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionPatient feedback is relevant information for improvement of health care professionals' performance. Engaging patients in feedback conversations can help to harness patient feedback as a powerful tool for learning. However, health care settings may prevent patients and health care professionals to effectively engage in a feedback dialogue. To advance our understanding of how feedback conversations may support learning in and from practice, we sought to explore patients' and health care providers' perspectives on engaging patients in feedback conversations as informal learning opportunities.MethodsFor this qualitative study, we used a pragmatic approach and conducted semi‐structured interviews with 12 health care providers and 10 patient consultants. We applied an inductive approach to thematic analysis to understand interviewees' perceptions regarding patient feedback for workplace learning.ResultsParticipants attributed importance to patient feedback and described how the feedback may improve treatment relationships, professionals' performance and care processes on the team level and the organisational level. Participants experienced conflicting roles as patient and educator or expert and learner, respectively. Changing relationships, feelings of vulnerability and perceived power dynamics in treatment relationships would affect participants' engagement in feedback conversations. Patients and professionals alike saw a role for themselves in giving or inviting feedback but often missed the tools for engaging in feedback conversations.DiscussionPatient feedback can contribute to professionals' practice‐based learning but requires navigating tensions around conflicting roles and power dynamics in the treatment relationship. Both patients and health care professionals need to embrace vulnerability and may need facilitation and guidance to use patient feedback effectively. Attention to power dynamics, if not a shift towards collaborative relationships, is however crucial to engage patients in feedback conversations, thereby capitalising the power patients posses.

Funder

Maastricht Universitair Medisch Centrum

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3