Bacteremia following different oral procedures: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Martins Carolina C.1ORCID,Lockhart Peter B.2ORCID,Firmino Ramon T.13,Kilmartin Catherine4,Cahill Thomas J.5ORCID,Dayer Mark6ORCID,Occhi‐Alexandre Ingrid G. P.17ORCID,Lai Honghao8ORCID,Ge Long8ORCID,Thornhill Martin H.29ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatric Dentistry Dental School, Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

2. Department of Oral Medicine/Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Carolinas Medical Center, Atrium Health Charlotte North Carolina USA

3. UNIFACISA, Campina Grande, Brazil; and Department of Pediatric Dentistry Dental School, Federal University of Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil

4. University of Toronto Toronto Canada

5. Oxford Heart Centre Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Oxford UK

6. Department of Cardiology Somerset Foundation Trust Taunton Somerset UK

7. Faculty Herrero Curitiba Brazil

8. Evidence‐Based Social Science Research Center School of Public Health, Lanzhou University Lanzhou China

9. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Medicine, Surgery and Pathology School of Clinical Dentistry, University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

Abstract

AbstractTo evaluate the timing, duration and incidence of bacteremia following invasive dental procedures (IDPs) or activities of daily living (ADL). Eight databases were searched for randomized (RCTs) and nonrandomized controlled trials (nRCTs) evaluating bacteremia before and after IDPs or ADL in healthy individuals. The risk of bias was assessed by RoB 2.0 and ROBINS‐I. For the meta‐analysis, the primary outcomes were the timing and duration of bacteremia. The secondary outcome was the incidence of bacteremia, measuring the proportion of patients with bacteremia within 5 min after the end of the procedure compared with baseline. We included 64 nRCTs and 25 RCTs. Peak bacteremia occurred within 5 min after the procedure and then decreased over time. Dental extractions showed the highest incidence of bacteremia (62%–66%), followed by scaling and root planing (SRP) (44%–36%) and oral health procedures (OHP) (e.g., dental prophylaxis and dental probing without SRP) (27%–28%). Other ADL (flossing and chewing) (16%) and toothbrushing (8%–26%) resulted in bacteremia as well. The majority of studies had some concerns RCTs or moderate risk of bias nRCTs. Dental extractions, SRP and OHP, are associated with the highest frequency of bacteremia. Toothbrushing, flossing, and chewing also caused bacteremia in lower frequency.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Dentistry,Otorhinolaryngology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3