Influence of abutment shape on peri‐implant tissue conditions: A randomized clinical trial

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo analyze the influence of 3‐mm high abutments with different shapes (cylindrical abutment vs. wide abutment) on marginal bone‐level changes (bone loss and bone remodeling). The influence of abutment shape on implant success, probing pocket depth (PPD), and bleeding on probing (BoP) was studied as secondary objectives.Materials and MethodsPatients with a partially edentulous area requiring fixed dental prostheses by two implants in the posterior mandible or maxilla were included. The implants were 1 mm subcrestally placed, and osseointegration healing was submerged. Three‐mm high abutments with two different shapes were randomly placed in second‐stage surgery: cylindrical abutments (cylindrical group) and wide abutments (wide group). Marginal bone‐level changes were measured using parallelized periapical radiographs at abutment placement, at definitive prosthesis placement, and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after loading. PPD and BoP were likewise measured at the control visits.ResultsSixty‐four dental implants in 25 patients were included. Statistically significant differences were found in bone‐level changes. The cylindrical group exhibited less mean marginal bone remodeling (MBR) and marginal bone loss (MBL) than the wide group (p < .05). Moreover, the cylindrical group showed significantly less BoP (p < .05).ConclusionAbutment shape had a significant influence upon marginal bone‐level changes during the first 12 months. Cylindrical abutments caused less MBR and MBL than wide abutments. More clinical studies involving longer follow‐ups and analyzing other abutment modifications are needed to improve our understanding of how abutments can affect peri‐implant tissue stability.