Assessment of subchondral bone microdamage quantification using contrast‐enhanced imaging techniques

Abstract

AbstractBone microdamage is common at subchondral bone (SCB) sites subjected to repeated high rate and magnitude of loading in the limbs of athletic animals and humans. Microdamage can affect the biomechanical behaviour of bone under physiological loading conditions. To understand the effects of microdamage on the mechanical properties of SCB, it is important to be able to quantify it. The extent of SCB microdamage had been previously estimated qualitatively using plain microcomputed tomography (μCT) and a radiocontrast quantification method has been used for trabecular bone but this method may not be directly applicable to SCB due to differences in bone structure. In the current study, SCB microdamage detection using lead uranyl acetate (LUA) and quantification by contrast‐enhanced μCT and backscattered scanning electron microscopy (SEM) imaging techniques were assessed to determine the specificity of the labels to microdamage and the accuracy of damaged bone volume metrices. SCB specimens from the metacarpus of racehorses, with the hyaline articular cartilage (HAC) removed, were grouped into two with one group subjected to ex vivo uniaxial compression loading to create experimental bone damage. The other group was not loaded to preserve the pre‐existing in vivo propagated bone microdamage. A subset of each group was stained with LUA using an established or a modified protocol to determine label penetration into SCB. The μCT and SEM images of stained specimens showed that penetration of LUA into the SCB was better using the modified protocol, and this protocol was repeated in SCB specimens with intact hyaline articular cartilage. The percentage of total label localised to bone microdamage was determined on SEM images, and the estimated labelled bone volume determined by μCT in SCB groups was compared. Label was present around diffuse and linear microdamage as well as oblique linear microcracks present at the articular surface, except in microcracks with high‐density mineral infills. Bone surfaces lining pores with recent mineralisation were also labelled. Labelled bone volume fraction (LV/BV) estimated by μCT was higher in the absence of HAC. At least 50% of total labels were localised to bone microdamage when the bone area fraction (B.Ar/T.Ar) of the SCB was greater than 0.85 but less than 30% when B.Ar/T.Ar of the SCB was less than 0.85. To adjust for LUA labels on bone surfaces, a measure of the LV/BV corrected for bone surface area (LV/BV BS−1) was used to quantify damaged SCB. In conclusion, removal of HAC and using a modified labelling protocol effectively stained damaged SCB of the metacarpus of racehorses and represents a technique useful for quantifying microdamage in SCB. This method can facilitate future investigations of the effects of microdamage on joint physiology.