Mucosal antibody responses following Vaxzevria vaccination

Author:

Selva Kevin J1,Ramanathan Pradhipa1,Haycroft Ebene R1,Tan Chee Wah23,Wang Lin‐Fa24,Downie Laura E5,Davis Samantha K1,Purcell Ruth A1,Kent Helen E1,Juno Jennifer A1ORCID,Wheatley Adam K1,Davenport Miles P6,Kent Stephen J17ORCID,Chung Amy W1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia

2. Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases Duke‐NUS Medical School Singapore

3. Infectious Diseases Translational Research Programme, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine National University of Singapore Singapore

4. Singhealth Duke‐NUS Global Health Institute Singapore

5. Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences University of Melbourne Carlton VIC Australia

6. Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales Kensington NSW Australia

7. Melbourne Sexual Health Centre and Department of Infectious Diseases Alfred Hospital and Central Clinical School, Monash University Melbourne VIC Australia

Abstract

AbstractMucosal antibodies play a key role in protection against breakthrough COVID‐19 infections and emerging viral variants. Intramuscular adenovirus‐based vaccination (Vaxzevria) only weakly induces nasal IgG and IgA responses, unless vaccinees have been previously infected. However, little is known about how Vaxzevria vaccination impacts the ability of mucosal antibodies to induce Fc responses, particularly against SARS‐CoV‐2 variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we profiled paired mucosal (saliva, tears) and plasma antibodies from COVID‐19 vaccinated only vaccinees (uninfected, vaccinated) and COVID‐19 recovered vaccinees (COVID‐19 recovered, vaccinated) who both received Vaxzevria vaccines. SARS‐CoV‐2 ancestral‐specific IgG antibodies capable of engaging FcγR3a were significantly higher in the mucosal samples of COVID‐19 recovered Vaxzevria vaccinees in comparison with vaccinated only vaccinees. However, when IgG and FcγR3a engaging antibodies were tested against a panel of SARS‐CoV‐2 VoCs, the responses were ancestral‐centric with weaker recognition of Omicron strains observed. In contrast, salivary IgA, but not plasma IgA, from Vaxzevria vaccinees displayed broad cross‐reactivity across all SARS‐CoV‐2 VoCs tested. Our data highlight that while intramuscular Vaxzevria vaccination can enhance mucosal antibodies responses in COVID‐19 recovered vaccinees, restrictions by ancestral‐centric bias may have implications for COVID‐19 protection. However, highly cross‐reactive mucosal IgA could be key in addressing these gaps in mucosal immunity and may be an important focus of future SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccine development.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

National Medical Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Cell Biology,Immunology,Immunology and Allergy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3