Conscientious objection to caring for transgender people: An ethical right or a discriminatory attitude?

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundIn modern society, health professionals are often asked to use their technical skills to serve purposes other than treating illnesses. In such cases, some clinicians may express ethical reluctance to fulfill their patients' preferences. Conscientious objection in health care is the refusal by providers to perform a legally valid and scientifically approved clinical intervention because of moral concerns. Although health services and staff are obliged to respect gender identity and prohibit discrimination, some clinicians may exempt themselves from caring for transgender people, citing ethical reasons. The decision of health professionals to object to medical activities related to transgender care may collide with the interests of trans people and further marginalizes the already underprivileged gender‐diverse population.AimThis discussion paper analyses the concept of ‘conscientious objection’ and its application in health care settings in relation to transgender‐related care.Findings and ConclusionIn general, the right of health professionals to abstain from contested duties on moral grounds must be protected. However, claims to conscience cannot be accepted within centers specialized in gender transitioning and for services unrelated to gender affirmation such as routine and urgent care. Personal responsibility and discretion on the part of clinicians is the most appropriate way to compromise between protecting the moral integrity of health professionals and shielding trans persons‘ access to care. Guidance is proffered on how to resolve the apparent impasse emerging from the denial of various types of health services to transgender people.