Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Prevalence of sustainable and unsustainable use of wild species inferred from the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species

Published:2021-11-17 Issue: Volume: Page:
ISSN:0888-8892
Container-title:Conservation Biology
language:en
Short-container-title:Conservation Biology

Author:

Marsh Sophie M. E.¹^ORCID,Hoffmann Michael²^ORCID,Burgess Neil D.³⁴^ORCID,Brooks Thomas M.⁵⁶⁷^ORCID,Challender Daniel W. S.⁸^ORCID,Cremona Patricia J.⁹^ORCID,Hilton‐Taylor Craig⁹^ORCID,Micheaux Flore Lafaye⁵¹⁰¹¹^ORCID,Lichtenstein Gabriela¹²^ORCID,Roe Dilys¹³^ORCID,Böhm Monika¹⁴^ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment University College London London UK

2. Conservation and Policy Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park London UK

3. UNEP‐WCMC Cambridge UK

4. CMEC, GLOBE Institute University of Copenhagen Copenhagen Denmark

5. International Union for Conservation of Nature Gland Switzerland

6. World Agroforestry Center (ICRAF) University of the Philippines Los Baños The Philippines

7. Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies University of Tasmania Hobart Tasmania Australia

8. Department of Zoology University of Oxford Oxford UK

9. International Union for Conservation of Nature Cambridge UK

10. Institute of Geography and Sustainability University of Lausanne Lausanne Switzerland

11. French Institute of Pondicherry Pondicherry India

12. Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano (INAPL)/CONICET Buenos Aires Argentina

13. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED) and IUCN Sustainable Use and Livelihoods Specialist Group (SULi) London UK

14. Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London London UK

Funder

Rufford Foundation

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nature and Landscape Conservation,Ecology,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cobi.13844

Reference41 articles.

1. Anderwald P. Ambarli H. Avramov S. Ciach M. Corlatti L. Farkas A. Jovanovic M. Papaioannou H. Peters W. Sarasa M. Šprem N. Weinberg P. &Willisch C.(2020). Rupicapra rupicapra (amended version of 2020 assessment). The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2021: e.T3955A195863093

2. The global amphibian trade flows through Europe: The need for enforcing and improving legislation;Auliya M.;Biodiversity and Conservation,2016

3. Factors contributing to the longevity of the commercial use of crocodiles by Indigenous people in remote Northern Australia: A case study;Austin B. J.;Rangeland Journal,2012

4. Unintended consequences of the ‘bushmeat ban’ in West Africa during the 2013–2016 Ebola virus disease epidemic;Bonwitt J.;Social Science & Medicine,2018

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The global distribution of plants used by humans;Science;2024-01-19

2. Establishment, characterization and application in germplasm conservation and disease resistance: An embryonic cell line from Yangtze sturgeon (Acipenser dabryanus);Aquaculture;2023-10

3. Characterising the links between the trade in donkey skins for traditional Chinese medicine and timber of conservation concern;Global Ecology and Conservation;2023-10

4. Conserving avian evolutionary history can effectively safeguard future benefits for people;Science Advances;2023-09-22

5. Determining the sustainability of legal wildlife trade;Journal of Environmental Management;2023-09