Software‐based interventions for low back pain management: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Author:

Hong Se Jin1ORCID,Park Jinkyung2ORCID,Park Soyeon3,Eze Bright4,Dorsey Susan G.5ORCID,Starkweather Angela6ORCID,Kim Kyounghae378ORCID

Affiliation:

1. College of Nursing Gachon University Incheon South Korea

2. College of Nursing Chonnam National University Gwangju South Korea

3. College of Nursing Korea University Seoul South Korea

4. School of Nursing University of Connecticut Storrs Connecticut USA

5. School of Nursing University of Maryland Baltimore Maryland USA

6. College of Nursing University of Florida Gainesville Florida USA

7. Nursing Research Institute Korea University Seoul South Korea

8. BK21 FOUR R&E Center for Learning Health Systems Korea University Seoul South Korea

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionUsing software for self‐management interventions can improve health outcomes for individuals with low back pain, but there is a dearth of research to confirm its effectiveness. Additionally, no known research has evaluated the effective elements of software‐based interventions for low back pain self‐management components. This study aimed to synthesize the effectiveness of software‐based interventions to promote self‐management health outcomes among individuals with low back pain.DesignA systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted.MethodsFollowing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses Statement, relevant studies up to July 2022 were searched via four electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science.Results4908 adults with low back pain who participated in 23 studies were included. Software‐based interventions were effective in reducing fear avoidance (mean difference [MD] = −0.95, 95% CI: −1.45 to −0.44), pain catastrophizing (MD = −1.31, 95% CI: −1.84 to −0.78), disability (MD = −8.21, 95% CI: −13.02 to −3.39), and pain intensity (MD = −0.86, 95% CI: −1.17 to −0.55). Specifically, interventions that included an exercise component were more effective in reducing pain and disability. Additionally, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) intervention significantly reduced fear avoidance and pain catastrophizing but had no noticeable impact on disability and pain compared to standard treatment. The certainty of the evidence in this review varied from very low to high across outcomes. The heterogeneity of the study results was significant, suggesting that future studies in this area could optimize the design, time points, measures, and outcomes to strengthen the evidence.ConclusionsLow back pain self‐management interventions delivered through software‐based programs effectively reduce pain intensity, disability, fear avoidance, and pain catastrophizing.Clinical RelevanceLow back pain is among the most common reasons for seeking healthcare visits. Combining exercise and counseling through soft‐based programs may effectively address this issue and its associated suffering and disability.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Nursing

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3