Methodological Challenges in Social Science: Making Sense of Polarized and Competing Research Claims-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Methodological Challenges in Social Science: Making Sense of Polarized and Competing Research Claims

Published:2020-04 Issue:2 Volume:58 Page:308-321
ISSN:1531-2445
Container-title:Family Court Review
language:en
Short-container-title:Family Court Review

Author:

Robb Aaron

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Law

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/fcre.12474

Reference87 articles.

1. Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (revisited).

2. Guidelines for the Use of Social Science Research in Family Law

3. American Heart Association News. (2018 August). Are eggs good for you or not? Retrieved fromhttps://www.heart.org/en/news/2018/08/15/are-eggs-good-for-you-or-not.

4. PARENTAL ALIENATION: CANADIAN COURT CASES 1989-2008

5. Meta-Analysis of Multiple Primary Prevention Trials of Cardiovascular Events Using Aspirin

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A structured rubric for evaluating the many systemic variables that can contribute to parent–child contact problems (PCCP);Family Court Review;2024-03-08

2. Dispute intensity, parent-child relationships and child functioning: Analysis of social workers' reports on families with high-intensity parental disputes;Child Abuse & Neglect;2023-10

3. International Relocation Disputes and the Risk of Cultural Bias in Family Law Matters;The International Journal of Children’s Rights;2023-04-07

4. Empirical research on parental alienation: A descriptive literature review;Children and Youth Services Review;2020-12

5. Misdirection and Double Standards Fail to Clarify Controversial Issues in Social Science;Family Court Review;2020-04