Personal career decisions during medical training are not complicated, they are complex

Author:

Harper Lea Lea1,Desy Janeve2ORCID,Davis Melinda1ORCID,Weeks Sarah2,McLaughlin Kevin2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Office of Postgraduate Medical Education, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

2. Office of Undergraduate Medical Education, Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundFor medical training to be deemed successful, in addition to gaining the skills required to make appropriate clinical decisions, trainees must learn how to make good personal decisions. These decisions may affect satisfaction with career choice, work–life balance, and their ability to maintain/improve clinical performance over time—outcomes that can impact future wellness. Here, the authors introduce a decision‐making framework with the goal of improving our understanding of personal decisions.MethodsStemming from the business world, the Cynefin framework describes five decision‐making domains: clear, complicated, complex, chaotic, and confusion, and a key inference of this framework is that decision‐making can be improved by first identifying the decision‐making domain. Personal decisions are largely complex—so applying linear decision‐making strategies is unlikely to help in this domain.ResultsThe available data suggest that the outcomes of personal decisions are suboptimal, and the authors propose three mechanisms to explain these findings: (1) Complex decision is susceptible to attribute substitution where we subconsciously trade these decisions for easier decisions; (2) predictions are prone to cognitive biases, such as assuming our situation will remain constant (linear projection fallacy), believing that accomplishing a goal will deliver lasting happiness (arrival bias), or overestimating benefits and underestimating costs of future tasks (planning fallacy); and (3) complex decisions have an inherently higher failure rate than complicated decisions because they are the result of an ongoing, dynamic person‐by‐situation interaction and, as such, have more time to fail and more ways to do so.DiscussionBased upon their view that personal decisions are complex, the authors propose strategies to improve satisfaction with personal decisions, including increasing awareness of biases that may impact personal decisions. Recognising that the outcome of personal decisions can change over time, they also suggest additional interventions to manage these decisions, such as different forms of mentoring.

Publisher

Wiley

Reference61 articles.

1. A critical review of the definition of ‘wellbeing’ for doctors and their patients in a post Covid-19 era

2. The paradox of story: simplicity and complexity in strategy scenario and strategy;Snowden D;Plan Theory,1999

3. The new dynamics of strategy: Sense-making in a complex and complicated world

4. A leader's framework for decision‐making;Snowden DJ;Harv Bus Rev,2007

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3