Patient and public involvement in health research from researchers' perspective

Author:

Røssvoll Toril B.1ORCID,Rosenvinge Jan H.1ORCID,Liabo Kristin2ORCID,Hanssen Tove A.1ORCID,Pettersen Gunn1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health and Care Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway Tromsø Norway

2. College of Medicine and Health, PenCLAHRC Patient and Public Involvement Team University of Exeter Medical School Exeter UK

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPatient and public involvement (PPI) is increasingly considered an integral part of health research, and the focus has shifted from why we need PPI to how users can be involved in a meaningful way. The rationale for investigating experiences with PPI from the perspective of occupational therapy (OT)‐trained researchers' originates in the interrelationship between the inclusive approach to knowledge production, and participation and inclusion as core tenets of OT. The aim of this study was to explore PPI in health research from the perspective of OT‐trained researchers.MethodSemi‐structured individual interviews were conducted online with nine Norwegian researchers. The interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsProfessional background and clinical experience from person‐centred OT formed the foundation for how these researchers approached and facilitated PPI in their research. Valuing experiential knowledge and facilitating PPI to be meaningful for public collaborators were highlighted as essential for PPI to have an impact. The need to balance mutual expectations, requirements for research, and what might be possible to achieve within a research study were found to be vital.ConclusionCollaborative clinical experience constituted a sound foundation for implementing PPI in research. The occupational perspective underlines the importance of acknowledging experiential knowledge as essential to facilitating meaningful PPI. Challenges related to requirements for research and culture for implementing PPI were addressed by clarifying roles and expectations.Patient or Public ContributionThree public collaborators were involved in developing the aims, the interview guide, and the data analysis. They all had previous experience being involved in research.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Reference39 articles.

1. National Institute for Health and Care Research. Briefing notes for researchers—public involvement in NHS health and social care research. April 5 2021. Accessed January 12 2023.https://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/briefing-notes-for-researchers-public-involvement-in-nhs-health-and-social-care-research/27371?pr

2. Epistemic justice in public involvement and engagement: Creating conditions for impact

3. Preparing for patient partnership: A scoping review of patient partner engagement and evaluation in research

4. Engaging stakeholders in rehabilitation research: a scoping review of strategies used in partnerships and evaluation of impacts

5. Participation of mental health consumers in research: Training addressed and reliability assessed

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3