Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study

Published:2016-06-24 Issue:3 Volume:20 Page:519-528
ISSN:1369-6513
Container-title:Health Expectations
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Expect

Author:

Crocker Joanna C.¹²^ORCID,Boylan Anne-Marie³⁴,Bostock Jennifer⁵,Locock Louise¹³

Affiliation:

1. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; Oxford UK

2. Health Experiences Institute; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK

3. Health Experiences Research Group; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK

4. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford UK

5. UK

Funder

National Institute on Handicapped Research

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

University Of Oxford

Applied Health Research and Care Oxford

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/hex.12479/fullpdf

Reference22 articles.

1. INVOLVE What is public involvement in research? 2015 http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/

2. What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials;Dudley;PLoS ONE,2015

3. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review;Brett;Health Expectations,2014

4. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review;Domecq;BMC Health Services Research,2014

5. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice;Esmail;Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,2015

Cited by 108 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Weight management communications in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: challenges and recommendations from the patients’ perspective;BMJ Neurology Open;2023-12

2. Working with public contributors in Parkinson's research: What were the changes, benefits and learnings? A critical reflection from the researcher and public contributor perspective;Health Expectations;2023-11-21

3. ‘Including us, talking to us and creating a safe environment’—Youth patient and public involvement and the Walking In ScHools (WISH) Study: Lessons learned;Health Expectations;2023-10-06

4. Involving patients and the public in nursing PhD projects: practical guidance, potential benefits and points to consider;Nurse Researcher;2023-09-21

5. Barriers to Meaningful Participatory Mental Health Services Research and Priority Next Steps: Findings From a National Survey;Psychiatric Services;2023-09-01