Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study

Published:2016-06-24 Issue:3 Volume:20 Page:519-528
ISSN:1369-6513
Container-title:Health Expectations
language:en
Short-container-title:Health Expect

Author:

Crocker Joanna C.¹²^ORCID,Boylan Anne-Marie³⁴,Bostock Jennifer⁵,Locock Louise¹³

Affiliation:

1. NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre; Oxford UK

2. Health Experiences Institute; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK

3. Health Experiences Research Group; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; University of Oxford; Oxford UK

4. NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust; Oxford UK

5. UK

Funder

National Institute on Handicapped Research

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

University Of Oxford

Applied Health Research and Care Oxford

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/hex.12479/fullpdf

Reference22 articles.

1. INVOLVE What is public involvement in research? 2015 http://www.invo.org.uk/find-out-more/what-is-public-involvement-in-research-2/

2. What Difference Does Patient and Public Involvement Make and What Are Its Pathways to Impact? Qualitative Study of Patients and Researchers from a Cohort of Randomised Clinical Trials;Dudley;PLoS ONE,2015

3. Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review;Brett;Health Expectations,2014

4. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review;Domecq;BMC Health Services Research,2014

5. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice;Esmail;Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,2015

Cited by 120 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Setting the international research agenda for sarcomas with patients and carers: results of phase II of the Sarcoma Patient Advocacy Global Network (SPAGN) priority setting partnership;BMC Cancer;2024-08-06

2. Helping parents know when to seek help for an acutely ill child: Evidence based co-development of a mobile phone app using complex intervention methodology;International Journal of Medical Informatics;2024-07

3. Childhood Interstitial Lung Disease clinical research: A child-parent dyad survey on research preferences and acceptability;2024-06-25

4. Engaging women to set the research agenda for assisted vaginal birth;Health Expectations;2024-06

5. Performance of amplicon and capture based next-generation sequencing approaches for the epidemiological surveillance of Omicron SARS-CoV-2 and other variants of concern;PLOS ONE;2024-04-29