Affiliation:
1. Veterinary Medicine Department Paraná Federal University Curitiba Brazil
2. UniRadio São Paulo Brazil
3. Department of Clinical Sciences and Advanced Medicine Section of Radiology, School of Veterinary Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia USA
Abstract
ObjectivesTo assess the accuracy and interobserver agreement of tele‐ultrasonography for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal obstruction in small animals by radiologists with different levels of experience.Materials and MethodsA retrospective cross‐sectional study including dogs and cats admitted with gastrointestinal signs, between 2017 and 2019, that had abdominal ultrasonographic (US) examination performed and images saved for review. Patients were classified into two categories based on final diagnosis: animals with or without complete or partial gastrointestinal obstruction. Observers with four experience levels interpreted the archived ultrasound examinations, simulating a tele‐ultrasonography consultation. Analyses of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were obtained for each observer for detection of gastrointestinal obstruction. Agreement between observers for the gastrointestinal obstruction diagnosis was assessed using Fleiss's Kappa statistics.ResultsNinety patients with gastrointestinal signs were included. Of these, 23 of 90 had partial or complete gastrointestinal obstruction. Interpretation of the images by observers via tele‐ultrasonography showed intervals of accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, respectively, of 78.9% to 87.8%, 73.9% to 100%, 77.6% to 89.6%, 55.9% to 70.8% and 90.9% to 100% for diagnosis of gastrointestinal obstruction. Agreement for the gastrointestinal obstruction diagnosis across all reviewers was moderate (Kappa 0.6).Clinical SignificanceTele‐ultrasonography had good accuracy for detection of gastrointestinal obstruction, however had a rather low positive predictive value and only moderate interobserver agreement. Therefore, this technique should be used with caution in this clinical context, given the potential surgical decision at hand.