Affiliation:
1. Department of Surgical Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine ‐ University of Pisa Pisa Italy
2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center – University of Freiburg Freiburg Germany
Abstract
SummaryOver the last decades, neuroimaging has become a substantial component of insomnia research. While theoretical underpinnings of different studies vary just like methodological choices and the experimental design, it is suggested that major features of insomnia disorder rely on the impaired function, structure, metabolism and connectivity of brain areas involved in sleep generation, emotion regulation, self‐processing/‐awareness and attentional orientation. However, neuroimaging research on insomnia often suffers from small sample sizes, heterogeneous methodology and a lack of replicability. With respect to these issues, the field needs to address the questions: (1a) how sufficiently large sample sizes can be accumulated within a reasonable economic framework; (1b) how effect sizes in insomnia‐related paradigms can be amplified; (2a) how a higher degree of standardisation and transparency in methodology can be provided; and (2b) how an adequate amount of flexibility/complexity in study design can be maintained. On condition that methodological consistency and a certain degree of adaptability are given, pooled data/large cohort analyses can be considered to be one way to answer these questions. Regarding experimental single‐centre trials, it might be helpful to focus on insomnia‐related transdiagnostic concepts. In doing so, expectable effect sizes (in between‐subjects designs) can be increased by: (a) comparing groups that are truly distinct regarding the variables examined in a concept‐specific paradigm; and (b) facilitated, intensified and precise elicitation of a target symptom.
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Cognitive Neuroscience,General Medicine
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献