Social network interventions to reduce race disparities in living kidney donation: Design and rationale of the friends and family of kidney transplant patients study (FFKTPS)

Author:

Daw Jonathan1,Verdery Ashton M.1,Ortiz Selena E.2,Reed Rhiannon Deierhoi3,Locke Jayme E.3,Redfield Robert R.4,Kloda David3ORCID,Liu Michel4,Mentch Heather4,Sawinski Deirdre5ORCID,Aguilar Diego6,Porter Nathaniel D.7ORCID,Roberts Mary K.1,McIntyre Katie8,Reese Peter P.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Sociology & Criminology Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

2. Department of Health Policy & Administration Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania USA

3. Department of Surgery University of Alabama at Birmingham Birmingham Alabama USA

4. Department of Medicine Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

5. Department of Medicine Weill Cornell Medical College Cornell University New York New York USA

6. Unaffiliated researcher Armonk New York USA

7. University Libraries and Department of Sociology Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Blacksburg Virginia USA

8. Department of Sociology Birmingham‐Southern College Birmingham Alabama USA

Abstract

AbstractIntroductionRacial/ethnic disparities in living donor kidney transplantation (LDKT) are a persistent challenge. Although nearly all directed donations are from members of patients’ social networks, little is known about which social network members take steps toward living kidney donation, which do not, and what mechanisms contribute to racial/ethnic LDKT disparities.MethodsWe describe the design and rationale of the Friends and Family of Kidney Transplant Patients Study, a factorial experimental fielding two interventions designed to promote LKD discussions. Participants are kidney transplant candidates at two centers who are interviewed and delivered an intervention by trained center research coordinators. The search intervention advises patients on which social network members are most likely to be LKD contraindication‐free; the script intervention advises patients on how to initiate effective LKD discussions. Participants are randomized into four conditions: no intervention, search only, script only, or both search and script. Patients also complete a survey and optionally provide social network member contact information so they can be surveyed directly. This study will seek to enroll 200 transplant candidates. The primary outcome is LDKT receipt. Secondary outcomes include live donor screening and medical evaluations and outcomes. Tertiary outcomes include LDKT self‐efficacy, concerns, knowledge, and willingness, measured before and after the interventions.ConclusionThis study will assess the effectiveness of two interventions to promote LKD and ameliorate Black‐White disparities. It will also collect unprecedented information on transplant candidates’ social network members, enabling future work to address network member structural barriers to LKD.

Funder

Social Science Research Institute, Pennsylvania State University

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

Comprehensive Transplant Institute, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Transplantation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3