Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Science policies: How should science funding be allocated? An evolutionary biologists’ perspective

Published:2019-07-05 Issue:8 Volume:32 Page:754-768
ISSN:1010-061X
Container-title:Journal of Evolutionary Biology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Evol Biol

Author:

Meirmans Stephanie¹^ORCID,Butlin Roger K.²³,Charmantier Anne⁴,Engelstädter Jan⁵,Groot Astrid T.⁶,King Kayla C.⁷,Kokko Hanna⁸,Reid Jane M.⁹,Neiman Maurine¹⁰¹¹

Affiliation:

1. Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

2. Department of Animal and Plant Sciences The University of Sheffield Sheffield UK

3. Department of Marine Sciences University of Gothenburg Strömstad Sweden

4. CEFE UMR 5175 CNRS Université Paul‐Valery Montpellier Université de Montpellier Montpellier Cedex 05 France

5. School of Biological Sciences The University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia

6. Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED) University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands

7. Department of Zoology Christ Church College University of Oxford Oxford UK

8. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies University of Zurich Zurich Switzerland

9. School of Biological Sciences University of Aberdeen Aberdeen UK

10. Department of Biology University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA

11. Department of Gender, Women's, and Sexuality Studies University of Iowa Iowa City IA USA

Funder

H2020 European Research Council

Australian Research Council

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/jeb.13497

Reference58 articles.

1. The Predictive Ability of Peer Review of Grant Proposals: The Case of Ecology and the US National Science Foundation

2. The fourth age of research

3. Global urban signatures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations

4. Urban driven phenotypic changes: empirical observations and theoretical implications for eco-evolutionary feedback

5. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Relational responsibilities: Researchers perspective on current and progressive assessment criteria: A focus group study;PLOS ONE;2024-09-04

2. The role of collaborative research network on E-waste studies in North America using a bibliometric approach;Ecological Informatics;2024-09

3. Legacy effects of crop sequencing on biomass and their variability on farmers' fields in Finland are shaped by weather, farm conditions and rationales for land use;Agricultural Systems;2024-03

4. Universal productivity patterns in research careers;Physical Review Research;2023-12-05

5. References;Fifty Years of Evolution in Biological Research;2023-09-05