Affiliation:
1. Department of Psychology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia USA
2. VA Boston Healthcare System Boston Massachusetts USA
3. Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine Boston Massachusetts USA
4. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Emory University School of Medicine Atlanta Georgia USA
5. Department of Psychology University of Georgia Athens Georgia USA
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveWe sought to factor analyze a broad array of aggression measures to identify a comprehensive, coherent factor structure for this construct.BackgroundMeasures and models of trait aggression have multiplied to the point of incoherence.MethodIn Study 1, a diverse sample of 922 undergraduates completed a battery of items acquired from 42 self‐report aggression questionnaires. In Study 2, we administered a curated item pool to another diverse sample of 1447 undergraduates, alongside criterion measures.ResultsWe curated an initial item pool of 734 items down to 289 items that exhibited sufficient variability, were not redundant with other items, and possessed strong loadings onto a central ‘trait aggression’ factor. These remaining items were best characterized by a six‐factor structure, which captured relational, angry, violent, retaliatory, intimate partner, and alcohol forms of aggression. We estimated their hierarchical structure, correlations with their original aggression scales, Five Factor Model trait dimensions, impulsivity facets, and found them to be robust to gender composition and the inclusion of alcohol‐naive and intimate‐partner‐naive participants.ConclusionsThis factor structure mostly supported widely‐accepted models of aggressive personality that focus on its overt and relational forms and reactive functions, though proactive aggression only loosely emerged as a distinct entity. We retained the final items as the Comprehensive Aggression Scale (CAS).
Funder
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism