Affiliation:
1. Centre for Research on Self and Identity, School of Psychology University of Southampton Southampton UK
2. Institute on Aging University of Wisconsin‐Madison Madison Wisconsin USA
3. School of Psychology Bond University Robina Queensland Australia
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveWhat are the motivational underpinnings of solitude? We know from self‐report studies that increases in solitude are associated with drops in approach motivation and rises in avoidance motivation, but only when solitude is experienced as non‐self‐determined (i.e., non‐autonomous). However, the extent to which individual differences in solitude relate to neurophysiological markers of approach–avoidance motivation derived from resting‐state electroencephalogram (EEG) is unknown. These markers are Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, beta suppression, and midline Posterior versus Frontal EEG Theta Activity.MethodWe assessed the relation among individual differences in the reasons for solitude (i.e., preference for solitude, motivation for solitude), approach–avoidance motivation, and resting‐state EEG markers of approach–avoidance motivation (N = 115).ResultsGeneral preference for solitude was negatively related to approach motivation, observed in both self‐reported measures and EEG markers of approach motivation. Self‐determined solitude was positively related to both self‐reported approach motivation and avoidance motivation in the social domain (i.e., friendship). Non‐self‐determined solitude was negatively associated with self‐reported avoidance motivation.ConclusionThis research was a preliminary attempt to address the neurophysiological underpinnings of solitude in the context of motivation.
Funder
Economic and Social Research Council