Big Five personality traits predict small but robust differences in civic engagement

Author:

Stahlmann Alexander G.1ORCID,Hopwood Christopher J.1ORCID,Bleidorn Wiebke1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology University of Zurich Binzmühlestrasse 14, Box 7 Zurich CH‐8050 Switzerland

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis preregistered study provides robust estimates of the links between Big Five personality traits and civic engagement across different samples and life stages.MethodsWe recruited two samples from the United States and United Kingdom (total N = 1593) and measured Big Five domains, Big Five aspects, and six civic engagement indicators: volunteerism, charitable giving, donating blood, posthumous organ donation, political voting, and vaccination. We compared the links between these measures across samples and tested moderation across life stages and several sociodemographic variables. We explored whether these links replicate between self‐ and peer‐reports.ResultsWe found small but robust effects. Agreeable, extraverted, and open/intellectual participants reported more civic engagement, especially volunteerism and charitable giving. Neurotic and conscientious participants mainly reported less civic engagement, especially blood and organ donations. One of the two Big Five aspects often drove these links, such as Compassion in the link between Agreeableness and volunteerism. We found some differences between younger and middle‐aged adults.ConclusionsBig Five personality traits predict civic engagement modestly but consistently, with adequate study power being critical to detecting these links. Lower‐order traits, such as Big Five aspects, clarify the relationships between traits and engagement. Life stages and sociodemographic variables have limited effects.

Funder

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Social Psychology

Reference78 articles.

1. Predisposed to Volunteer? Personality Traits and Different Forms of Volunteering

2. What Do We Mean By “Civic Engagement”?

3. Bates D. Maechler M. Bolker B. &Walker S.(2021).lme4: Linear mixed‐effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 (R package version 1.1‐27.1).https://cran.r‐project.org/package=lme4

4. A mega-analysis of personality prediction: Robustness and boundary conditions.

5. Traditional and Health-Related Philanthropy: The Role of Resources and Personality

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3