A prospective randomized comparative trial of pediatric C‐MAC D‐blade video laryngoscope with McCoy direct laryngoscope for intubation in children posted for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia

Author:

Kamal Geeta1,Agarwal Divyamedha1,Agarwal Shilpa1,Gupta Anju2ORCID,Gupta Aikta1,Kalra Bhumika1,Gupta Nishkarsh2

Affiliation:

1. Chacha Nehru Bal Chikitsalya New Delhi India

2. All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi India

Abstract

AbstractBackgroundPediatric airway management requires careful clinical evaluation and experienced execution due to anatomical, physiological, and developmental considerations. Video laryngoscopy in pediatric airways is a developing area of research, with recent data suggesting that video laryngoscopes are better than standard Macintosh blades. Specifically, there is a paucity of literature on the advantages of the C‐MAC D‐blade compared to the McCoy direct laryngoscope.MethodsAfter Ethics Committee approval, 70 American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1 and 2 children aged 4–12 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were recruited. Patients were randomly allocated to intubation using a C‐MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D‐blade (Group 1) and a McCoy laryngoscope size 2 blade (Group 2). The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) for ease of intubation was the primary outcome, while Cormack–Lehane grades, duration of laryngoscopy and intubation, hemodynamic responses, and incidence of any airway complications were secondary outcomes.ResultsBoth groups were comparable in terms of patient characteristics. The median (IQR) Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS) score was better but was statistically nonsignificant with C‐MAC (0 [0–0] vs. 0 [0–2], p = .055). The glottic views were superior (CL grade I in 32/35 vs. 23/35, p = .002), and the time to best glottic view (6 s [5–7] vs. 8.0 s [6–10], p = .006) was lesser in the C‐MAC D‐blade group while the total duration of intubation was comparable (20 s [16–22] vs. 18 s [15–22], p = .374). All the patients could be successfully intubated on the first attempt. None of the patients had any complications.ConclusionThe C‐MAC video laryngoscope size 2 D‐blade provided faster and better glottic visualization but similar intubation difficulty compared to McCoy size 2 laryngoscope in children. The shorter time to achieve glottic view demonstrated with the C‐MAC failed to translate into a shorter total duration of intubation when compared to the McCoy laryngoscope attributable to a pronounced curvature of the D‐blade.

Publisher

Wiley

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3