Meta‐analysis: Placebo rates in microscopic colitis randomised trials and applications for future drug development using a historical control arm

Author:

Hamilton Patrick1,Buhler Katherine2,MacDonald John K.3,Kaplan Gilaad G.24ORCID,Seow Cynthia H.24ORCID,Lu Cathy2ORCID,Novak Kerri L.24ORCID,Andrews Christopher N.2ORCID,Singh Siddharth5ORCID,Jairath Vipul367ORCID,Panaccione Remo1ORCID,Ma Christopher234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

2. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Department of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

3. Alimentiv Inc. London Ontario Canada

4. Department of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary Calgary Alberta Canada

5. Division of Gastroenterology University of California San Diego San Diego California USA

6. Division of Gastroenterology Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry Western University London Ontario Canada

7. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics Western University London Ontario Canada

Abstract

SummaryBackgroundEffective medical therapies for patients with microscopic colitis (MC) who fail budesonide are lacking. However, conducting randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in MC has been challenging due to small sample sizes. Understanding placebo responses can help inform more efficient future trials.AimsThe aim of this study is to estimate clinical and histologic placebo response rates and to determine factors associated with placebo response in MC.MethodsEMBASE, MEDLINE, and CENTRAL were searched until 7 January 2022, to identify placebo‐controlled RCTs in adult patients with MC. Clinical and histologic response in the placebo arms were pooled using random‐effects models. Stratified analyses based on disease‐ and trial‐level characteristics, leave‐one‐out meta‐analysis, and cumulative meta‐analysis were performed.ResultsTwelve RCTs enrolling a total of 391 patients (placebo n = 163) with MC were included. Pooled clinical and histologic placebo response rates were 24.4% (95% CI: 12.4%–38.4%), I2 = 60.8%, p < 0.01, and 19.9% (95% CI: 5.3%–39.0%), I2 = 66.4%, p = 0.01 (tests for heterogeneity), respectively. Clinical response to placebo was numerically higher in patients with lymphocytic compared to collagenous colitis (39.9% vs. 19.8%, p = 0.08). Heterogeneity in clinical response to placebo was significantly reduced when the Miehlke 2014 RCT was excluded in the leave‐one‐out meta‐analysis or when a more stringent secondary definition of response based on the Hjortswang criteria was applied.ConclusionsApproximately one‐quarter of patients in MC trials respond to placebo, although with substantial heterogeneity, reflecting the need for standardised outcome definitions and study designs for MC. This analysis also serves to inform future MC trials that may consider incorporating an external, historical placebo control arm, rather than directly randomising patients to placebo.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Pharmacology (medical),Gastroenterology,Hepatology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3