De‐Biasing Legal Fact‐Finders With Bayesian Thinking-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

De‐Biasing Legal Fact‐Finders With Bayesian Thinking

Published:2019-04-03 Issue:4 Volume:12 Page:1115-1131
ISSN:1756-8757
Container-title:Topics in Cognitive Science
language:en
Short-container-title:Top Cogn Sci

Author:

Dahlman Christian¹

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Law Lund University

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Artificial Intelligence,Cognitive Neuroscience,Human-Computer Interaction,Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Link

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/tops.12419

Reference8 articles.

1. Factual ambiguity and a theory of evidence;Allen R.;Nortwestern University Law Review,1994

2. Miss rate neglect in legal evidence

3. Dawid P.(1993).The island problem — coherent use of identification evidence. Research Report No. 115. University College London.https://www.ucl.ac.uk/statistics/research/pdfs/rr115.pdf

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A systematic account of probabilistic fallacies in legal fact-finding;The International Journal of Evidence & Proof;2023-10-29

2. M-LAMAC: a model for linguistic assessment of mitigating and aggravating circumstances of criminal responsibility using computing with words;Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-07-04

3. Using Agent-Based Simulations to Evaluate Bayesian Networks for Criminal Scenarios;Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law;2023-06-19

4. ‘It sounds like lived experience’ - On empathy in rape trials;International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice;2023-03

5. Reasonable Doubt from Unconceived Alternatives;Erkenntnis;2022-05-24