Health outcomes and service use patterns associated with co‐located outpatient mental health care and alcohol and other drug specialist treatment: A systematic review

Author:

Glover‐Wright Clare1ORCID,Coupe Kym1ORCID,Campbell Alexander Charles1ORCID,Keen Claire1ORCID,Lawrence Patrick2,Kinner Stuart A.1345ORCID,Young Jesse T.1367ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Equity, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health The University of Melbourne Melbourne Australia

2. First Step Melbourne Australia

3. Centre for Adolescent Health, Murdoch Children's Research Institute Melbourne Australia

4. School of Population Health Curtin University Perth Australia

5. Griffith Criminology Institute Griffith University Brisbane Australia

6. School of Population and Global Health The University of Western Australia Perth Australia

7. National Drug Research Institute Curtin University Perth Australia

Abstract

AbstractIssuesDespite long‐standing recommendations to integrate mental health care and alcohol and other drug (AOD) treatment, no prior study has synthesised evidence on the impact of physically co‐locating these specialist services on health outcomes.ApproachWe searched Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL for studies examining health outcomes associated with co‐located outpatient mental health care and AOD specialist treatment for adults with a dual diagnosis of substance use disorder and mental illness. Due to diversity in study designs, patient populations and outcome measures among the included studies, we conducted a narrative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed using the MASTER scale.Key FindingsTwenty‐eight studies met our inclusion criteria. We found provisional evidence that integrated care that includes co‐located mental health care and AOD specialist treatment is associated with reductions in substance use and related harms and mental health symptom severity, improved quality of life, decreased emergency department presentations/hospital admissions and reduced health system expenditure. Many studies had a relatively high risk of bias and it was not possible to disaggregate the independent effect of physical co‐location from other common aspects of integrated care models such as care coordination and the integration of service processes.ImplicationsThere are few high‐quality, peer‐reviewed studies establishing the impact of co‐located mental health care and AOD specialist treatment on health outcomes. Further research is required to inform policy, guide implementation and optimise practice.ConclusionIntegrated care that includes the co‐location of mental health care and AOD specialist treatment may yield health and economic benefits.

Funder

National Health and Medical Research Council

The Ross Trust

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Health (social science),Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3