The “5Ts” screening tool: Enhancements and threshold values for effective TMD identification

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThis study aimed to enhance the quintessential “five temporomandibular disorder (TMD) symptoms” (5Ts) screener by incorporating frequency options and distinguishing between TMJ and muscle pain. The diagnostic accuracy along with cut‐off points for the effective identification of TMDs was also established.MethodsParticipants, aged ≥18 years, were recruited from a university‐based hospital. After completing surveys encompassing demographic data and the enhanced 5Ts (with frequency options [5Ts‐F] and differentiation of TMJ/muscle pain [6Ts‐F]), protocolized interviews and clinical examinations were performed following DC/TMD. The diagnostic accuracy and best cut‐off points were determined with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).Results324 participants were recruited (mean age 30.0 ± 11.4 years). Among these, 86.4% had TMDs. 5Ts exhibited high diagnostic accuracy for detecting all TMDs (AUC = 0.92) with sensitivity/specificity values of 83.9%/88.6%. Both 5Ts‐F and 6Ts‐F had slightly better accuracy (AUCs = 0.95/0.96), comparable sensitivity, and superior specificity (97.7%) compared to 5Ts. The best cut‐off points were 1.5 for 5Ts and 2.5 for 5Ts‐F/6Ts‐F.ConclusionsAlthough all three TMD screeners presented high diagnostic accuracy, 5Ts‐F/6Ts‐F had notably improved specificity. 5Ts scores of >1.5 and 5Ts‐F/6Ts‐F scores of >2.5 are to be applied for screening the presence of TMDs.