Affiliation:
1. Department of Internal Medicine, Section Gerontology and Geriatrics Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
2. LUMC Center for Medicine for Older People (LCO) Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
3. Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam University Medical Center Amsterdam The Netherlands
4. Department of Public Health and Primary Care Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
Abstract
AbstractBackgroundThe broad concept of health as “the ability to adapt and self‐manage in the face of social, physical and emotional challenges” has been operationalized by “Positive Health,” a framework increasingly used in the Netherlands. We explored to what degree the impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic and preventive measures on Positive Health differed between community‐dwelling older adults without, with mild and with complex health problems, as well as differences flowing from their use of preventive measures.MethodsDuring the second wave in the Netherlands (November 2020–February 2021), a convenience sample of adults aged ≥65 years completed an online questionnaire. Positive Health impact was measured based on self‐reported change of current health status, across six dimensions, compared to before the pandemic (decreased/unchanged/increased). The complexity of health problems (past month) was assessed using the validated ISCOPE tool, comparing subgroups without, with mild or with complex health problems. High use of preventive measures was defined as ≥9 of 13 measures and compared to low use (<9 measures).ResultsOf the 2397 participants (median age 71 years, 60% female, and 4% previous COVID‐19 infection), 31% experienced no health problems, 55% mild health problems, and 15% complex health problems. Overall, participants reported a median decrease in one Positive Health dimension (IQR 1–3), most commonly in social participation (68%). With an increasing complexity of health problems, subjective Positive Health declined more often across all six dimensions, ranging from 3.3% to 57% in those without, from 22% to 72% in those with mild, and from 47% to 75% in those with complex health problems (p‐values for trend <0.001; independent of age and sex). High users of preventive measures more often experienced declined social participation (72% vs. 62%, p < 0.001) and a declined quality of life (36% vs. 30%, p = 0.007) than low users, especially those with complex health problems.ConclusionAs the complexity of health problems increased, the adverse impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic and related preventive measures was experienced more frequently across all dimensions of Positive Health. Acknowledging this heterogeneity is pivotal to the effective targeting of prevention and healthcare to those most in need.
Subject
Geriatrics and Gerontology
Reference29 articles.
1. Age distribution of COVID patients in hospitals in the Netherlands. Accessed February 14 20232021https://coronadashboard.government.nl/artikelen/leeftijdsverdeling-van-covid-patienten-in-de-ziekenhuizen: Government of the Netherlands.
2. Coronavirus Dashboard – Mortality. Accessed February 14 20232022https://coronadashboard.government.nl/landelijk/sterfte: Government of the Netherlands.
3. BuurmanBORM MaasH MooijaartSP.COVID‐19 bij ouderen.MedischContact 2020.
4. Coronavirus tijdlijn [Coronavirus timeline]. Accessed August 18 2022https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/onderwerpen/coronavirus-tijdlijnGovernment of the Netherlands; 2020–2022.
5. Ageism and COVID-19: what does our society’s response say about us?