Affiliation:
1. Center for the Integration of Faith and Work, Department of Management and Marketing University of Dayton Ohio Dayton USA
2. Department of Management and Marketing Oakland University Rochester Michigan USA
Abstract
AbstractThe Business Roundtable's “Purpose of a Corporation” letter announced a shift from stockholder primacy to stakeholder primacy. Interestingly, we contend the letter's language employed a technical efficiency emphasis, suggesting a firm's executives chose to make this shift because they believed doing so would improve the firm's financial performance, via improved corporate governance. We examine whether investors actually accepted the technical efficiency arguments at face value, or in contrast believed the announcements were merely a “rational myth,” what management thought investors would want to hear. We employ a 2‐day cumulative abnormal return (CAR) event study for 140 publicly‐held firms. Overall, we find investor support for the announcement. In addition, we found how returns to firms with prior similar announcements were negative at the time of the announcement. Also, the returns for firms having multiple signatories were positive and significant.
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Economics and Econometrics,Philosophy,Business and International Management
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Politics and Better Business;Journal of Sustainable Marketing;2023-11-16
2. ESG en Route to Statism;Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics;2023-10-27