Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading

Published:2015-11 Issue:11 Volume:42 Page:1042-1051
ISSN:0303-6979
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Periodontology
language:en
Short-container-title:J Clin Periodontol

Author:

Schincaglia Gian Pietro¹,Thoma Daniel S.²,Haas Robert³,Tutak Marcin⁴,Garcia Abel⁵,Taylor Thomas D.⁶,Hämmerle Christoph H. F.²

Affiliation:

1. School of Dentistry Universita' di Ferrara; Ferrara Italy

2. Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science; Center of Dental Medicine; University of Zurich; Zurich Switzerland

3. Akademie für Orale Implantologie; Private Practice; Vienna Austria

4. Aesthetic Dent; Private Practice; Szczecin Poland

5. University of Santiago de Compostela; Santiago de Compostela Spain

6. Division of Prosthodontics; School of Dental Medicine; University of Connecticut; Farmington CT USA

Funder

DENTSPLY Implants, Mölndal, Sweden

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Periodontics

Link

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/wol1/doi/10.1111/jcpe.12465/fullpdf

Reference47 articles.

1. Peri-implant tissues at submerged and non-submerged titanium implants;Abrahamsson;Journal of Clinical Periodontology,1999

2. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success;Albrektsson;International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants,1986

3. Short dental implants: a systematic review;Annibali;Journal of Dental Research,2012

4. Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog;Araujo;Journal of Clinical Periodontology,2005

5. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review;Atieh;International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants,2012

Cited by 58 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Prospective clinical-radiological study of the survival and behavior of short implants;The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry;2024-09

2. Alveolar ridge preservation in posterior maxillary teeth for reduction in the potential need for sinus floor elevation procedures: A pilot study;Clinical Oral Implants Research;2024-08-21

3. Survival Rates of Short Dental Implants (≤6 mm) Used as an Alternative to Longer (>6 mm) Implants for the Rehabilitation of Posterior Partial Edentulism: A Systematic Review of RCTs;Dentistry Journal;2024-06-17

4. Short (≤6 mm) compared with ≥10‐mm dental implants in different clinical scenarios: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials with meta‐analysis, trial sequential analysis and quality of evidence grading;Journal of Clinical Periodontology;2024-05-20

5. Randomized controlled multi‐centre study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10‐year data;Journal of Clinical Periodontology;2024-01-31