Neurological assessment tool for screening infants during the first year after birth: The Brief‐Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination

Author:

Romeo Domenico M.12ORCID,Velli Chiara1,Sini Francesca1,Pede Elisa12,Cicala Graziamaria1,Cowan Frances M.3,Ricci Daniela14,Brogna Claudia1,Mercuri Eugenio12

Affiliation:

1. Paediatric Neurology Unit Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy

2. Paediatric Neurology Unit Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore Roma Rome Italy

3. Department of Paediatrics Imperial College London UK

4. National Centre of Services and Research for the Prevention of Blindness and Rehabilitation of Low Vision Patients—International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness (IAPB) Italia Onlus Rome Italy

Abstract

AbstractAimTo develop a short version of the original Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE) to be used as a screening tool (Brief‐HINE) and to establish if the short examination maintains good accuracy and predictive power for detecting infants with cerebral palsy (CP).MethodEleven items were selected from the original HINE (‘visual response’; ‘trunk posture’; ‘movement quantity’; ‘movement quality’; ‘scarf sign’; ‘hip adductor angles’; ‘popliteal angle’; ‘pull to sit’; ‘lateral tilting’; ‘forward parachute reaction’; ‘tendon reflexes’) identifying those items previously found to be more predictive of CP in both low‐ and high‐risk infants. In order to establish the sensitivity of the new module, the selected items were applied to existing data, previously obtained using the full HINE at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, in 228 infants with typical development at 2 years and in 82 infants who developed CP.ResultsBrief‐HINE scores showed good sensitivity and specificity, at each age of assessment, for detecting infants with CP. At 3 months, a score of less than 22 was associated with CP with a sensitivity of 0.88 and a specificity of 0.92; at 6, 9, and 12 months, the cut‐off scores were less than 25 (sensitivity 0.93; specificity 0.87), less than 27 (sensitivity 0.95; specificity 0.81), and less than 27 (sensitivity 1; specificity 0.86) respectively. The presence of more than one warning sign, or items that are not optimal for the age of assessment, imply the need for a full examination reassessment.InterpretationThese findings support the validity of the Brief‐HINE as a routine screening method and the possibility of its use in clinical practice.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Neurology (clinical),Developmental Neuroscience,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3