Process evaluation of a primary care‐based type 2 diabetes remission project in the North East of England

Author:

Boocock Ruth C.12ORCID,Moore Helen J.23ORCID,Lake Amelia A.12ORCID,Haste Anna23

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Public Health Research, School of Health & Life Sciences Teesside University Middlesbrough UK

2. Fuse, The Centre for Translational Research in Public Health Newcastle UK

3. School of Social Sciences, Humanities & Law Teesside University Middlesbrough UK

Abstract

AbstractA type 2 diabetes remission project, Remission in Diabetes (REMI.D), funded by Sport England, was developed by stakeholders based in the North East of England and begun in early 2020. This local delivery pilot sought to tackle health inequalities by working with multiple organisations to demonstrate a way of scaling up an effective type 2 diabetes remission strategy which included both physical activity and dietary components. The intended delivery of the original project was impacted by the COVID‐19 pandemic and changes were made to the project delivery in 2022. The aim of this process evaluation was to learn from the reactive decisions taken by stakeholders which altered the REMI.D project in response to the COVID‐19 pandemic. Twelve stakeholders (from local authorities, secondary care, universities, NHS England commissioning, Diabetes UK, Sport England, Everyone Active and Active Partnerships) involved in the design and delivery of the intervention took part in a semi‐structured interview lasting up to 60 min. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis used the pre‐determined ‘core content’ themes from the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions. Three topics for discussion emerged as follows: (a) lack of effective collaboration, (b) perception of change and (c) scalability of the intervention. Hierarchy within the stakeholder group initially hampered collaboration. Change was reactive as a result of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Project changes reduced project sustainability and scalability but offered valuable learning about the need for explicit project theory for partnership working, co‐production with service users and project flexibility for long‐term health behaviour change.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)

Reference38 articles.

1. C4PC. (2020)NHS England and coalition for personalised care: a co‐production model. [Accessed 31st July 2023].

2. A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity

3. Charles. (2020)Integrated care systems explained: making sense of systems places and neighbourhoods. Available at:https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/integrated‐care‐systems‐explained[Accessed 5th October 2023].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3