Psychometric testing of a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – Neonatology questionnaire has confirmed validity

Author:

Weis Janne1ORCID,Beck Sanne Allermann1,Jensen Andreas2ORCID,Brødsgaard Anne34ORCID,Latour Jos M.5,Greisen Gorm16ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Intensive Care of Newborns and Small Children, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

2. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Rigshospitalet Copenhagen University Hospital Copenhagen Denmark

3. Research Unit for Nursing and Health, Faculty of Health University of Aarhus Aarhus Denmark

4. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine & Gynaecology and Obstetrics Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre Copenhagen Denmark

5. School of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health University of Plymouth Plymouth UK

6. Institute of Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University Copenhagen Denmark

Abstract

AbstractAimInvestigating parent satisfaction with care is important to guide quality development. In this study, we translated and validated a Danish version of the empowerment of parents in the intensive care – neonatology (EMPATHIC‐N) questionnaire to determine validity in Danish contexts.MethodA psychometric study design was applied. Translation was performed according to recommended international standards. Confirmatory factor analyses including standardised factor loadings, Cronbach's α reliability estimates, congruent validity and non‐differential validity testing were applied. The study was performed from June 2017 to November 2019 at a 33‐bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit.ResultsParticipants were 311 parents (response rate = 42,8%). Confirmative factor analyses disclosed a moderate model fit of the instrument with Comparative Fit Index (CFI) values of 0.83–0.92. Cronbach's α showed good reliability (0.82–0.93). Congruent validity showed good positive correlations (0.48–0.71) between the instrument domains and four overall satisfaction indicators. In search of improved model fit, a version including 27 items was tested. This version showed a better model fit with CFI values of 0.92–0.99 and satisfactory Cronbach's α values.ConclusionsModel fit for the Danish full EMPATIC‐N was moderate. The shorter version showed better psychometric properties.

Publisher

Wiley

Subject

General Medicine,Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Reference33 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3