Critical cognitive science: A systematic review towards a critical science

Author:

Carbajal Iván1ORCID,Moore Everrett2,Cabrera Martinez Lianelys1,Hunt Kiara1

Affiliation:

1. School of Psychological Science Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA

2. Department of Psychology University of North Texas Denton Texas USA

Abstract

AbstractMany leading scholars have highlighted the use of Critical Race Theory (CRT) in approaching research and practice in psychology. Critical Race Theory allows for cognitive science to take a more intersectional perspective rather than perpetuate the exclusionary and universal limitations associated with traditional cognitive science. This review and commentary apply CRT to cognitive science to address three main goals. The first is describing the history of cognitive science and how CRT tenets can help understand the need for a critical race perspective. Second is applying the CRT tenet of recognizing racism in cognitive science through a rigorous systematic review. The third is highlighting the tenet of whitewashing psychological phenomenon to explain epistemic exclusion and provide recommendations to combat it. CRT is an important framework in cognitive science as it can help combat the harmful methodologies and implications that have been perpetuated for decades (e.g., racist assumption of intelligence, exclusion of participants because of hair texture).

Publisher

Wiley

Reference103 articles.

1. American Psychological Association. (2021 October).Historical chronology.American Psychological Association.https://www.apa.org/about/apa/addressing‐racism/historical‐chronology

2. American Psychological Association. (2022a).APA's commitment to addressing systemic racism.APA.https://www.apa.org/about/apa/addressing‐racism

3. American Psychological Association. (2022b).Demographics of U.S. Psychology Workforce [Interactive data tool]. Retrieved October 1st 2023 fromhttps://www.apa.org/workforce/data‐tools/demographics

4. American Psychological Association. (2017).Multicultural guidelines: An ecological approach to context identity and intersectionality. Retrieved fromhttps://www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural‐guidelines.aspx

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3